The purpose of this pilot trial is to examine the feasibility and ease of use of monitoring by ClearSight in laboring and delivering patients with the intent to compare time-to-treatment of hypotension between conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight, in a population of healthy laboring women who receive epidural analgesia.
In a prospective study, we will achieve the following aims: To determine the feasibility and ease of use of the ClearSight monitoring system in the labor-delivery room (LDR) in detecting and monitoring hypotensive events post-epidural labor analgesia placement. To compare the Time-to-Treatment of hypotensive events between the conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
34
Continuous blood pressure monitoring for precision hypotensive event response
Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.
Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Time-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)
The difference in time between diagnosis of hypotension and treatment by clinical staff between CM and HPI groups
Time frame: From epidural placement until 4-hours post-infusion start
Ease of Use by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of ease of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems easy to use."
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Ease of Hypotension Detection by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of ease of hypotension detection using ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems suitable."
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Satisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of satisfaction of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device meets my approval."
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Total Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)
Average number of minutes patients spent within hypotensive events for each group (CM and CM + HPI).
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Nausea (Yes/No)
Proportion of patients by group reporting nausea within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Vomiting (Yes/No)
Proportion of patients by group reporting Vomiting within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Phenylephrine, mg
Average phenylephrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Ephedrine, mg
Average ephedrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Intravenous Fluids, mL
Average volume of fluids given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Number of Reported Changes in Fetal Heart Rate Category (From Healthy to Deceleration or Excelleration)
Total number of participants who experienced changes in fetal heart rate category (any)
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations Within 1 Hour of Initiation of ELA
Percentage of patients who experience any fetal heart rate deceleration event \[Presence (Yes) or absence (No)\] within 1-hour of epidural placement.
Time frame: Epidural placement to 1-hour post-infusion start