The FLOW trial evaluates the follow-up of the vascular access for hemodialysis. In current clinical care, vascular access flow volume is periodically assessed to detect and treat asymptomatic stenosis. The FLOW trial will determine whether it is safe to abandon this practice of active surveillance. Vascular access stenosis will then be treated only when clinical problems of flow dysfunction occur during hemodialysis. The investigators expect that the intervention rate and medical costs will be reduced by 40% when correction of vascular access stenosis is triggered by clinically apparent access dysfunction rather than asymptomatic flow reduction.
Study design: Multicenter randomized controlled trial with 375 patients. Patients will be followed up for 2 to 3 years. The trial is powered to detect a reduction in the intervention rate of 0.25 per year between study groups in a superiority analysis (this is associated with cost savings of 1 million euros per year in the Netherlands). Subgroup analyses of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts and of successful and failed interventions will be done. On 25-02-2025, the sample size was reduced from 417 to 375 patients because updated calculations based on actual event and loss to follow-up rates in the trial population showed sufficient power to detect the prespecified clinically relevant difference. Study population: Chronic hemodialysis patients with a functioning arteriovenous fistula or graft. Intervention group: Patients are referred for correction of the underlying stenosis when clinical signs of flow dysfunction are present. These include physical signs, problems during dialysis, or an unexplained, sustained fall in dialysis adequacy. Control group: Monthly surveillance of vascular access blood flow volume by ultrasound dilution measurements during hemodialysis sessions. Patients will be referred for correction of the underlying stenosis at an access flow volume \<500mL/min, or when clinical signs of flow dysfunction are present.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
375
Patients are referred for correction of the underlying stenosis when clinical signs of flow dysfunction are present. These include physical signs, problems during dialysis, or an unexplained, sustained fall in dialysis adequacy. Patients will be referred for correction of the underlying stenosis when clinical signs of flow dysfunction are present.
Monthly surveillance of vascular access blood flow volume by ultrasound dilution measurements during hemodialysis sessions. Patients will be referred for correction of the underlying stenosis at an access flow volume \<500mL/min.
Diapriva - Dialyse Centrum Amsterdam
Amsterdam, Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
Spaarne Gasthuis
Haarlem, Netherlands
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Heerlen, Netherlands
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
Bravis Ziekenhuis
Roosendaal, Netherlands
Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
Rotterdam, Netherlands
...and 3 more locations
Access-related intervention rate
The number of interventions required for each patient-year of hemodialysis treatment
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Access-related complications per patient-year (1)
Clavien-Dindo grade 2 complications (requiring pharmacological treatment)
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Access-related complications per patient-year (2)
Access-related serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade 4 and 5 complications, and vascular access thrombosis)
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Access-related health care costs (1)
Medical Consumption Questionnaire
Time frame: Every 3 months for 2-3 years from randomization (variable follow-up time)
Access-related health care costs (2)
Productivity Cost Questionnaire
Time frame: Every 3 months for 2-3 years from randomization (variable follow-up time)
Patient-reported outcome measures (1)
SF-VAQ (Short-Form Vascular Access Questionnaire)
Time frame: Every 3 months for 2-3 years from randomization (variable follow-up time)
Patient-reported outcome measures (2)
EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Every 3 months for 2-3 years from randomization (variable follow-up time)
Quality of the surveillance program (1)
Repeatability and reproducibility of vascular access flow volume measurements
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Quality of the surveillance program (2)
Diagnostic accuracy of vascular access flow volume measurements to predict clinical signs of flow dysfunction and access thrombosis within 1 month in the intervention group
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Quality of the surveillance program (3)
The percentage of vascular access balloon angioplasties resulting in technical success (residual stenosis \<30%) and clinical success (increase in flow volume to \>500mL/min, restoration of vascular access function and resolution of any clinical signs of flow dysfunction)
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Quality of the surveillance program (4)
Vascular access patency after balloon angioplasty
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Primary patency
This outcome measure will be registered for explanatory analyses
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Assisted primary patency
This outcome measure will be registered for explanatory analyses
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
Secondary patency
This outcome measure will be registered for explanatory analyses
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
The number of hemodialysis sessions with cannulation difficulties
This outcome measure will be registered for explanatory analyses
Time frame: Variable follow-up time of 2-3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.