African Americans are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. Addressing disparities in EoL care will need efforts to support a better understanding of African American patients' EoL cultural values and preferences for EoL communication and the impact of historical and ongoing care delivery inequities in healthcare settings. Our proposed "Caring for Older African Americans" training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and an implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication.
African Americans (AA) are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. For example, goals of care conversations, which are critical discussions between clinicians, patients, and families near the end of life, are less likely to occur for AAs than for Whites, and preferences are less likely to be followed when they do occur. Instead, families are more likely to be labeled as "difficult" if their decisions are incongruent with clinicians' recommendations. EoL decisions for many AA persons are rooted in both culture and a lifetime of experiences of structural racism. Efforts to address disparities need to address multiple factors such as patient-level cultural identity and EoL care values, interpersonal- and community-level norms for EoL communication and treatment, and healthcare institutional contexts for delivering EoL care in a setting affected by institutional racism. Our research group began to address this need with 'African American Community Speaks', a proof-of-concept prototype of a community-developed training program for clinicians caring for AA older adults with serious illnesses. The program originally focused on rural Southern older AAs and is not broadly generalizable across the US due to geographic differences in culture, attitudes, and communication preferences among AA persons in the US. Thus, we propose to adapt our prototype program to urban-dwelling Southern and Northern older AA adults using our established platform of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) in two geographically diverse regions: Birmingham, Alabama, and the Bronx, New York. To create the new training program called 'Caring for Older African Americans', our team of experts in CBPR, medical sociology, and clinical trials will work with local Community Advisory Boards to: 1. Conduct a comparative ethnographic study of urban dwelling AAs in the North and South to describe AA community values and preferences related to EoL care; 2. Adaptation of our prior community-developed training program by integrating community-developed storytelling videos for empathizing with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and adapting an existing implicit bias management program to goals of care communication; and 3. Conduct a cluster randomized trial in which we will randomize training times to 1 of 4 start dates using a stepped wedge design to accommodate the training of all clinicians and to mitigate the effect of secular trends. Patients' personal experience of racism will be measured using the discrimination subscale of the Group Based Mistrust Scale. The primary outcome will be patient/family's perception of therapeutic alliance using The Human Connection Scale. Secondary outcomes will be family-reported goal-concordant care, and clinicians' knowledge of cultural values, awareness of implicit bias, and confidence to change practice. This innovative effort will be the first training program that: 1. addresses culturally concordant care, systemic racism, and implicit bias management, the three key elements in enhancing the provision of equitable care; and 2. is designed and implemented in full partnership with two distinct AA communities in the South and the North of the US.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
The training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication.
UAB
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGAlbert Einstein/Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHuman Connection Scale (patient/family reported)
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
Time frame: up to 3 months before the intervention
Human Connection Scale (patient/ family reported)
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
Time frame: up to 3 months after intervention
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Goal Concordant Care will be measured based on responses to the following two questions, each with a dichotomous outcome: 1. Family member reports that the patient's end-of-life wishes were adequately discussed with the family respondent 2. Family member's satisfaction that patient's end-of-life were met. Johnson, S.B., Butow, P.N., Bell, M.L. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer. Br J Cancer 119, 1182-1190 (2018). https://doi.org.10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7
Time frame: up to 3 months before the intervention
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Goal Concordant Care will be measured based on responses to the following two questions, each with a dichotomous outcome: 1. Family member reports that the patient's end-of-life wishes were adequately discussed with the family respondent 2. Family member's satisfaction that patient's end-of-life were met. Johnson, S.B., Butow, P.N., Bell, M.L. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer. Br J Cancer 119, 1182-1190 (2018). https://doi.org.10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7
Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.