Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC. The combination of the ICI and other treatment regimens (Anti-VEGF, locoregional therapies et al) produced superior results in patients with advanced-stage HCC compared to those treated with traditional therapeutic regimens. Liver transplantation (LT) offers excellent long-term outcomes for certain patients with HCC. However, the immune-stimulating property of ICIs may lead to rejection and even graft loss, damping their use in treating HCC before liver transplantation. Therefore, it is worthwhile to explore the relationship between exposure to ICIs before LT and the incidence of graft rejection and rejection-related death or graft loss after LT.
This will be a retrospective and observational study, which will analyze the correlation between the use of ICIs and incidences of graft rejection and rejection-related death or graft loss after LT in consecutive recipients with LT for HCC at the Organ Transplantation Center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The primary aim of this study is to analyze the correlation between pretransplant exposure to ICIs and incidences of graft rejection and rejection-related death or graft loss within 1 year after liver transplantation. The secondary aim is to analyze the risk factors for graft rejection and to explore the correlation between ICI exposure and posttransplantation complication, such as incidences of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), bleeding, infection, biliary and vascular complications et al. The exploratory aim is to identify potential biomarkers in predicting graft rejection, such as subsets of lymphocytes and cytokines et al.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
160
Immune checkpoint inhibitors work by blocking checkpoint proteins from binding with their partner proteins. This prevents the "off" signal from being sent, allowing the T cells to kill cancer cells.One such drug acts against a checkpoint protein called CTLA-4. Other immune checkpoint inhibitors act against a checkpoint protein called PD-1 or its partner protein PD-L1.
Organ Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGGraft rejection
In this study, rejection was be defined as the elevation of transaminase during the recovery of liver function after LT (transaminases should gradually return to normal levels) or suddenly abnormal elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥2 times the upper limit that can be reversed by adjusting the immunosuppression regimen. Hepatic artery or portal vein thrombosis, drug toxicity or other factors should be excluded as the reason for liver function injury. Liver biopsies were not necessary for the diagnosis of rejection. The rejection activity index (RAI) was scored according to the Banff criteria to record the severity of acute rejection. An RAI score of 4-5 was defined as mild rejection, 6-7 was defined as moderate rejection, and 8-9 was defined as severe rejection.
Time frame: 1 year
Graft loss
Rejection related graft loss
Time frame: 1 year
Hospital death
rejection related death
Time frame: 1 year
Early allograft dysfunction (EAD)
EAD is defined by the presence of one or more of the following: total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL (171 μmol/L) or, INR ≥ 1.6 on day 7, and ALT/AST \> 2,000 IU/L within the first 7 days
Time frame: First 7 days after liver transplantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.