The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomized trial of a brief psychoeducational intervention versus enhanced usual care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who are initiating neoadjuvant multimodality treatment.
This is a randomized controlled trial that is split into two phases. Study Phase I tested the feasibility and acceptability of a study evaluating a psychoeducational intervention relative to a control condition for improving self-efficacy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer initiating multimodality treatment. This phase enrolled 20 participants. Study Part 2 was initially planned as an adequately powered RCT to evaluate intervention efficacy for enhancing patient self-efficacy for managing treatment-related challenges and maintaining quality of life. Due to the substantial refinements that were made to the PATHWAYS intervention and study procedures after Study Part 1, we have elected to change Study Part 2 to a second pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the refined PATHWAYS study among a larger group of patients (n=60). Participants in the intervention arm will be invited to receive the PATHWAYS intervention, including 4 coaching sessions with a study clinician focused on information and support related to multimodality treatment for LARC. Participants in the control arm will receive an information resource guide that is tailored for patients with LARC. It is expected that about 80 people will take part in this research study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
The PATHWAYS intervention is a psychoeducational intervention comprised of four behavioral coaching sessions and a patient education guidebook.
The enhanced usual care condition consists of an information resource guide.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGDana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGProportion of participants retained in the intervention (feasibility)
The primary outcome will be feasibility, defined as ≥60% retention of participants over the four-week intervention.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Proportion of patients enrolled on the study (feasibility)
A secondary feasibility outcome will be defined as ≥60% enrollment among all eligible patients
Time frame: 12 weeks
Proportion of participants reporting acceptability of the intervention (acceptability)
A secondary outcome of acceptability will be defined as ≥80% of participants in the intervention arm reporting Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) scores of ≥20 (scale from 8-32, higher scores indicate higher satisfaction).
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.