This study is a pragmatic clinical trial examining the comparative effectiveness of two stimulant medications (methylphenidate and amphetamine) in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents with autism. Using a sequential, multiple assignment randomization trial (SMART) design the study will not only assess these two medications but also the role of an increasingly popular class of ADHD medication, the alpha-2 agonists. Findings from this study will help improve clinicians' approach to medication selection and reduce the repeated trials of multiple medications that are current standard care.
Current data shows that 1 in 54 children in the United States are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Additional data shows that those diagnosed with autism are also at risk for being diagnosed with a co-occurring condition such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Managing the symptoms of each can be challenging for providers, patients, and parents. Patients with ASD who are diagnosed with ADHD often face the challenge of finding the best medication options to treat symptoms. It is known that children with ASD and ADHD frequently respond differently to these treatments than typically developing (TD) children. Currently, no clear recommendations exist for parents or providers to follow to guide best medication options for patients with ASD and ADHD. This lack of medication knowledge and suboptimal medication management can lead to poor results and have substantial negative life impact for patients and their families. The main goal of this study is to determine if the most prescribed medications for ADHD in TD children are similarly effective for patients who also have a diagnosis of autism. The results of this study will improve provider understanding of first-line stimulant medicines, methylphenidate and amphetamine compound, with ASD patients. Parents will determine medication effectiveness through discussion with their child and with their doctor as well as their own observations and will drive the medication adjustment process. Parents will provide ratings of effectiveness using the Clinical Global Impression measure every two weeks and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and the Vanderbilt Parent Rating Scale will be completed monthly. For those patients who do not respond to first-line medicines, this study will further develop the understanding of second-line medication options, the alpha2 agonists guanfacine and clonidine. Parents will provide ratings using the same measures as before. Additional study measures will collect and review parent/caregiver input in the process of determining medication continuation. Most measures will be completed through electronic portals, reducing the need for families to come to the hospital to participate in this study. While these medications are routinely prescribed to treat ADHD in children and adolescents with ASD, their relative effectiveness is not known. Randomizing participants to these different medicines in this format, called a SMART (Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomization Trial) design, will provide data on how well these medications work in children with ASD and ADHD, how they work compared to each other, and how their side effects differ from use in TD children. This study will also examine the effect of these medicines on target problems identified by parents, such as oppositional behavior. Parents/caregivers will be a significant part of the data and input captured to determine if medication should continue or be discontinued. The care team of patient, parent, and provider is solid in this project and will lead to optimal decision pathways for future patients with autism. The aims outlined in this study are beneficial to patients with autism and their families/caregivers who often help navigate health care with them for life. Having access to evidence-based best practices when making medication decisions can impact and expedite positive outcomes in managing the symptoms of ADHD. When symptoms are managed at optimal levels, patients can focus on building life skills and accessing opportunities toward meaningful life outcomes. Coproduced with parents and providers, this study is designed to reduce the trial and error aspect of prescribing ADHD medications and build provider and parent knowledge in best practice. The patient and family voice are an integral part of the study design process. This coproduction of treatment evidence helps ensure best outcomes for the patient and is supported by the inclusion of stakeholders. Participants will be children 4 to 17 years of age recruited from The Autism Care Network, the first and only network of its kind focused on better autism care, delivered at scale and at speed, to improve health and quality of life for children with autism and their families throughout North America. Twelve of the 20 network sites will participate in this study, each with providers and patients' parents committed to ensuring more than 500 patients will be part of this study and who are also committed to continuously improving whole-person and whole-family autism care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
Amphetamine (AMP) medication names: Adderall, Adderall XR, Adzenys ER, Adzenys XR-ODT, Dayanavel XR, Dexedrine (spansule), Dexedrine (tablet), Mydayis, Procentra liquid Methylphenidate (MPH) medication names: Adhansia XR, Aptensio XR, Azstarys, Concerta, Cotempla XR-ODT, Daytrana, Focalin, Focalin XR, Jornay PM. Metadate CD, Methylin (liquid), Ritalin, Ritalin LA, Quillichew ER, Quillivant XR (liquid)
If first line stimulant therapy (Amphetamine/Methylphenidate) is deemed not effective or tolerable, re-randomization to the alternate stimulant or alpha-2 agonist will occur. If participant is satisfied with first line stimulant treatment, first-line stimulant therapy will continue. Catapres, Clonidine, Guanfacine, Intuniv, Kapvay, Tenex
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, United States
RECRUITINGChildren's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGMaine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
RECRUITINGMassachusetts General Hospital Lurie Center for Autism
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
RECRUITINGCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGNationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
RECRUITING...and 2 more locations
The Vanderbilt Parent Rating Scale
The primary outcome measure is The Vanderbilt Parent Rating Scale for ADHD consists of 18 item, each scored from 0 to 3. It has a minimum score of 0, maximum score of 54. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Parent reported Clinical Global Impression
Parent reported Clinical Global Impression - Improvement is a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale
Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale consists of 16 items, each scored from 0 to 3. It has a minimum score of 0, maximum score of 48. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: 16 Weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.