The purpose of this study is to understand the financial burden and treatment decisions, based on both of patient's and family's perspectives in breast cancer patients who receive systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immuno-therapy and their family caregivers .
This study utilizes a cross-sectional survey and qualitative research design. Data collection includes questionnaire surveys and recorded qualitative interviews. A total of 224 patients or family members who meet the criteria will be invited to participate in the study at oncology units and outpatient clinics. Among them, 30 subjects, either patients or family caregivers will be invited to explore their experience on and concerns about financial burden and treatment decision making as facing breast cancer.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
224
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
RECRUITINGChinese version of the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36)
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability.
Time frame: within the past month
FACT-COST(COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity)
instrument that assesses the degree of financial distress experienced by cancer patient,12-item COST-PROM the terms used to describe feelings about financial condition have been numerous, including perceived economic well being,personal financial wellness, financial satisfaction, perceived income adequacy, financial stress, debt stress, economic strain, and economic distress.Using the Likert five-point scale, the scores represent the following: 0 indicates 'completely absent,' 1 indicates 'very few,' 2 indicates 'few,' 3 indicates 'some,' and 4 indicates 'very many.' Higher scores indicate better economic conditions
Time frame: Past 7 days
M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory
The first part of the MDASI consists of 13 single-item measures of symptom intensity, including fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, dry mouth, distress, and sadness. Each symptom item is rated on a scale of 0 (not al all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). The second part of the MDASI assesses the extent to which symptoms interfere with general activities, mood, normal work, relations with other people, walking, and enjoyment of life. Each of the six interference items is rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). A symptom severity composite score (average of the 13 symptom items) and an interference composite score (average of the six interference items) were computed.
Time frame: within 24 hours
Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief
12-item measure of self-efficacy for coping, including:(1) Maintenance of Activity and Independence; (2) Coping with Treatment-Related Side Effects; (3) Accepting Cancer/Maintaining Positive Attitude; (4) Seeking and Understanding Medical Information; (5) Affective Regulation; (6) Seeking Support; and (7) Stress Management for Medical Appointments. Likert-type scale that ranged from 1 (not at all confident) to 9 (totally confident), reflecting the degree of confidence the patient has that he or she can perform that particular coping behavior.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Past 7 days
Decisional Regret Scale
The Decision Regret Scale measures the level of regret that patients have regarding their overall cancer treatment. It consists of five items that assess feelings related to the rightness or wrongness of the decision, the harm caused, and whether they would make the same decision again after surgery. It is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a greater level of regret.
Time frame: Past 7 days
Financial and Work ability Index
The self-administered questionnaire consists of 7 items, including aspects such as physical and mental ability, cognitive function, and health status of the worker. The scores of each item are summed up, resulting in a total score ranging from 7 to 49. A higher score indicates better work ability. The work ability is assessed based on the total score
Time frame: Past a month