Blunt chest trauma is commonly associated with rib fractures and early pain management is a key goal after chest trauma. In spontaneous breathing patients, pain limits coughing efficiency and secretion clearance, thereby potentially leading to progressive atelectasis, loss of functional residual capacity (FRC) and, ultimately, respiratory distress. In patients under mechanical ventilation, pain interacts with the weaning of mechanical ventilation inducing an increase of the duration of invasive ventilation. According to recent French guidelines for chest trauma management, immediate analgesia is initially performed by intravenous multimodal analgesia followed by a thoracic epidural analgesia or a paravertebral block if the pain is not controlled within the first 12 hours. However, these blocks necessitate an experienced anaesthesiologist, are at risk of severe complications and are contraindicated in case of post-traumatic coagulopathy. All these considerations limit their indication in the trauma bay. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an easy to perform, ultrasound guided, regional anaesthesia for pain management after thoracic surgery. This block can be made continuously with a dedicated catheter for a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic drug with boli. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anaesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. This block is less invasive with fewer contraindications as compared to epidural analgesia or paravertebral blocks. After chest trauma, ESP block was associated with an improvement in respiratory capacity in a retrospective study. However, there is no randomised control trial assessing ESP efficacy. Our hypothesis is that early continuous ESP block in the trauma bay decreases the number of days with invasive and/or non-invasive ventilation after chest trauma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
400
Patients in the experimental group will have a continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block within the first 6 hours post-admission, with a continuous 1ml/h infusion of Ropivacaine (2mg/ml) associated with a 25 ml bolus every 6h. The catheter will be used from the trauma bay to the ICU as long as possible with a dedicated infusion pump (with a bolus mode). In case of accidental catheter removal, a second introduction of ESP block catheter is allowed within the first 24 hours. In case of continuous ESP block failure (incidence \< 5% of the total experimental group), patients will be switched to the control group.
CHU Bordeaux - Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
RECRUITINGHôpital d'instruction des armées Percy
Clamart, France
RECRUITINGCHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
RECRUITINGHopital Beaujon - AP-HP
Clichy, France
RECRUITINGCH Annecy Genevois
Épagny, France
RECRUITINGCHU Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGCHU de Lille
Lille, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Pitie Salpetriere - AP-HP
Paris, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Européen Georges Pompidou - AH-HP
Paris, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, France
RECRUITING...and 4 more locations
Assess the effect of early analgesia with continuous ESP block after chest trauma on the number of days alive and without invasive or non-invasive ventilation.
The primary endpoint is alive and ventilator free days (VFD) within the first 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block feasibility
Number of failure of catheter placement
Time frame: 48 hours
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block feasibility
Time from admission to catheter
Time frame: 24 hours
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block feasibility
Number of attempts
Time frame: 72 hours
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block efficacy
Pain at rest and during physiotherapy and coughing (Numerical Rating Scale : 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain)
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block efficacy
Opioid consumption during ICU stay
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block efficacy
Spirometry parameter (maximum exhaled volume in ml) collected the first seven days of ICU stay (after extubation if mechanically ventilated). The maximal volume collected by the device is 2500 mL.
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block efficacy on chronic pain
Chronic pain assessment with a verbal rating scale (VRS). 0 means no pain, 4 means worst possible pain
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block efficacy on neuropatic pain
neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). this score can range from 0 to 10 and is positive if greater than or equal to 4/10
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block safety
Number of haematoma after ESP block puncture
Time frame: 48 hours
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block safety
Number of pneumothorax after ESP block catheter insertion
Time frame: 72 hours
Comparison between the two groups of ESP block safety
Infection of the catheter during ESP block use
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of Morbidity and mortality
Number of Hospital Acquired Pneumonia during ICU stay
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of Morbidity and mortality
Intubation rate on Day 30
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of Morbidity and mortality
ICU-free days within the first 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of Morbidity and mortality
Mortality at Day one and at Day 30
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison between the two groups of Morbidity and mortality
Quality of life at 6 months with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN /DISCOMFORT and ANXIETY/DEPRESSION), each dimension has 5 response levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to/extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate his/her health state by checking the box next to the most appropriate response level for each of the 5 dimensions. The EQ VAS records the respondent's overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The EQ VAS provides a quantitative measure of the patient's perception of their overall health.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.