Patients with genitourinary cancers (ex: bladder, testicular, kidney) are at high risk of developing blood clots if they receive systemic therapy (ex: chemotherapy, immunotherapy). Blood clots cause pain, may require hospitalization and invasive testing, and in some cases cause death. In fact, blood clots are one of the leading causes of death in patients with cancer. Furthermore, patients who develop a blood clot require medication to thin the blood for a prolonged (sometimes indefinite) period of time, and this can disrupt other important cancer treatments. Studies have shown that using low dose blood thinners to prevent blood clots during systemic therapy is effective in some patients with cancer. However very few patients in these studies had genitourinary cancers, therefore physicians in Canada are not sure if recommending blood thinners to patients with genitourinary cancers is useful or safe. Safety is a primary concern because blood thinners may cause bleeding, and patients with genitourinary cancers may have higher risk of bleeding than patients with other types of cancer. The investigators hypothesize that blood thinners are effective and safe for reducing blood clots in patients with genitourinary cancers. The objective of this study is to determine if a large clinical trial testing the effectiveness and safety of low dose blood thinners for preventing blood clots in patients with genitourinary cancers receiving systemic therapy is feasible.
Background and Importance: Patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Thromboprophylaxis with antiocoagulants reduces VTEs during chemotherapy by 60%. Despite this, thromboprophylaxis is not routinely used in Canada for patients with genitourinary (GU) malignancies (bladder, testis, kidney). Reasons prophylaxis is not used are that very few GU patients were included in landmark trials evaluating DOACs, and because GU patients may be at higher risk of bleeding compared to non-GU cancer patients. The omission of GU patients from prior trials has created an important gap in knowledge because these patients have among the highest risk of VTE of all cancer patients. Prior studies have reported VTE rates during chemotherapy for bladder and testis cancer in the range of 10-15%, well above thresholds at which guidelines usually recommend thromboprophylaxis. Hypotheses: The investigators hypothesize that thromboprophylaxis with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) during systemic therapy for GU malignancies will reduce the risk of VTE with acceptable risk of major bleeding. Secondly, the investigators hypothesize that a randomized trial of thromboprophylaxis versus placebo in GU patients is feasible and needed to change care in Canada. Research goals: The goal of this pilot study is to determine if a randomized control trial of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban versus placebo in GU patients receiving systemic therapy is feasible. Methods: This internal pilot feasibility study will randomize patients with GU malignancies receiving systemic therapy (patients) to rivaroxaban 10mg daily (intervention) versus placebo (control). The primary outcome of this internal pilot study will be feasibility of patient accrual. Feasibility will be reported as the average number of patients enrolled per month. Secondary outcomes will be time to trial initiation, number of patients enrolled per site, and proportion of patients who complete the intervention. If feasibility is confirmed, patients enrolled in the pilot will be included in the full trial using a vanguard design. The primary outcome(s) of the full trial will be VTE (efficacy outcome) and major bleeding (safety outcome) during the intervention. Patient reported outcomes including quality of life will also be recorded. Expected outcomes: While thromboprophylaxis is effective in cancer patients, medical guidelines only recommend prophylaxis for some patients due to limited evidence in disease-specific subgroups. Importantly, safety concerns in GU patients are a particular concern necessitating further study of this population. The investigators expect the results of this internal pilot study to prove feasibility of a full trial. The full trial will determine the net benefits/harms of prophylaxis in GU patients and change practice worldwide, regardless of the results.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
120
The intervention in the experimental arm will be rivaroxaban, 10 mg PO once daily (prophylactic dosing) for 180 days after the start of systemic therapy or until one of the primary study outcomes occurs (VTE or major bleeding).
Identical to Rivaroxaban intervention except participants will receive a matched placebo instead of the study drug
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGFeasibility of enrollment, assesed by the number of patients accrued per month
The primary outcome of this Pilot Trial is feasibility of enrollment. Feasibility will be measured by the average number of patients accrued per month.
Time frame: Enrollment
Adherence to the study intervention, assessed as the proportion of patients taking the study medication >80% of days taken during the study period,
This outcome will measure patient adherence to the study intervention (defined as \>80% of medication taken during the study intervention period). This will be assessed using pill counts during study follow-ups.
Time frame: During 180 days of study intervention
Recruitment rate
Number of participants recruited per month at each study site
Time frame: Enrollment
VTE incidence
VTE will be recorded and adjudicated similarly to the full trial. Outcomes will be examined in aggregate to ascertain an estimate of baseline risk for patients in the trial. VTE outcomes will NOT be examined or reported by allocation group in the Pilot so all patients can be included in Full Trial analyses (internal pilot design).
Time frame: During 180 days of study intervention
Bleeding incidence
Bleeding outcomes (major and minor) will be recorded and adjudicated similarly to the full trial. Outcomes will be examined in aggregate to ascertain an estimate of baseline risk for patients in the trial. Bleeding outcomes will NOT be examined or reported by allocation group in the Pilot so all patients can be included in Full Trial analyses (internal pilot design).
Time frame: During 180 days of study intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.