This is an open label, randomised, phase 3, two-arm study conducted over 96 weeks. The study includes a screening period day - 60 to -1, enrolment visit day 0, and a 96-week treatment follow-up period. Approximately 600 male and female participants infected with HIV-1 eligible for first-line therapy, will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio approximately 300 participants per treatment group to either Treatment Group 1 DOR/3TC/TDF or Treatment Group 2 DTG/TAF/FTC. All medications will be administered in an open label design.
One of the major concerns, voiced by researchers, clinicians, and participants, is that data is severely limited to inform participants with side effects, or those wanting to avoid these side effects, as to evidence-based alternatives. As a result, there are no evidence-based regimens available for participants who have begun experiencing weight gain as a side effect on treatment or wanting to avoid weight gain on initiation of antiretrovirals which is now an almost routine side effect for women or Black participants. Switching to efavirenz-based regimens, while plausibly associated with weight mitigation in efavirenz slow-metabolizers, is accompanied by unacceptable metabolic, organ and neuropsychiatric side effects in the slow metabolizers likely to experience weight loss. There is minimal data on weight changes for switches from integrase inhibitors and having evidence-based options would dramatically add to treatment possibilities for participants. There is some evidence that the use of TDF and doravirine may mitigate the weight gain seen with TAF/integrase inhibitors combinations. Doravirine is a compelling replacement for the integrase inhibitors similarly well tolerated, and with a high resistance barrier and better lipid profile as compared to other drugs in the non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor class14. In a recent network meta-analysis, DOR/3TC/TDF was found to exhibit superiority in virological suppression to traditional first line non-DTG containing regimes with more tolerable side effects, and a decrease in severe adverse events. The DOR/3TC/TDF combination would be a major step forward for current treatment guidelines if found to be equivalent in terms of virological suppression and showed a meaningful difference in weight gain, as well as in cardiometabolic outcomes. This potentially offers clinicians and high risk participants an evidence-based alternative to TAF/integrase inhibitor combinations. We propose a head-to-head, non-inferiority, randomized study with DTG/TAF/FTC, against a formulation of DOR/3TC/TDF, in antiretroviral-naïve overweight participants, with differences in viral suppression as the primary end points weight gain and metabolic changes-being secondary endpoints of interest at 48 Weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
600
Treatment Group 1 Participants will receive Doravirine, as part of a fixed-dose oral combination with lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF, Delstrigo)tablets which are to be administered orally and once daily.
Treatment Group 2 Participants will receive dolutegravir, as part of a fixed-dose oral combination with tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine (DTG/TAF/FTC, KOCITAF) tablets which are to be administered orally and once daily.
Ezintsha Research Centre
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
The antiretroviral activity of DOR/3TC/TDF compared to DTG/TAF/FTC in the first line treatment, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48
HIV1-RNA
Time frame: 48 Weeks
The antiretroviral activity of DOR/3TC/TDF compared to DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96
HIV-1 RNA
Time frame: 96 Weeks
The antiretroviral activity of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 48 and Week 96
HIV-1 RNA
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
Time to virologic failure (defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 1000 copies/mL at week 24 or ≥ 200 copies/mL after week 24)
HIV-1 RNA
Time frame: 24 Weeks
The immunologic effect of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 48 and Week 96
CD4-T-cell count
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Adverse events
Time frame: 96 Weeks
The effect of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC on weight, as assessed by the mean change from baseline to Week 48 and Week 96
Weight
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
The effect on body composition of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the mean change from baseline to Week 48 and Week 96.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
The effect on hematology of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the mean change from baseline to Week 48 and Week 96.
Full blood count
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
The effect on lipid profile of DOR/3TC/TDF compared with DTG/TAF/FTC, as assessed by the mean change from baseline to Week 48 and Week 96
fasting lipogram
Time frame: 48 and 96 Weeks
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of DOR in pregnant women
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: 96 Weeks
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of DOR in pregnant women
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)
Time frame: 96 Weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.