Based on the previous successful experiences, the investigators like to extend our patient population. In this study, the investigators aim to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Biphasic Cartilage Repair Implant (BiCRI) in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee, including but not limited to more than one (1) lesion and the lesion that had been treated with microfracture or mosaicplasty but failed.
Patients who qualify for this trial and who are interested in participating will be consented using an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Informed Consent. Once a patient has signed the Informed Consent Form he/she is considered enrolled in the trial. If during surgery the size of lesion is found to meet exclusion criteria, the subject will be considered withdrawn (screen failure) from the trial. Clinical trial eligibility should be determined by confirmation that the patient meets the criteria included in the Protocol. Standard arthroscopic technique should be used to fully assess the joint and determine if the chondral or osteochondral defect is appropriate for inclusion in the study. Through arthroscopic examination after initial debridement, the investigator should use his best judgment to estimate the size of the lesion, and the number of BiCRI to be applied. Plain radiographs and MRI prior to 6-month (inclusive) visit will be performed according to routine clinical practice; however, 12-month and 24-monthpostoperative images should be done for study outcome evaluation
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
11
The Biphasic Cartilage Repair Implant (BiCRI) is a two-phase scaffold composed of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and β-triCalcium phosphate (TCP).
En Chu Kong Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Ministry of Health and Welfare Shuang-Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation compare to baseline
Time frame: 24 months after operation
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Knee Examination Form
International Knee Documentation CommitteeC-2000 Knee Examination Form compare to baseline
Time frame: 24 months after operation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) compare to baseline
Time frame: 24 months after operation
Pain (visual analogue scale;VAS)
Pain (visual analogue scale;VAS) compare to baseline
Time frame: 24 months after operation
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scale
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scale
Time frame: 24 months after operation
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation compare to baseline
Time frame: 12 months after operation
International Knee Documentation Committee-2000 Knee Examination Form
International Knee Documentation CommitteeC-2000 Knee Examination Form compare to baseline
Time frame: 12 months after operation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) compare to baseline
Time frame: 12 months after operation
Pain (visual analogue scale;VAS)
Pain (visual analogue scale;VAS) compare to baseline
Time frame: 12 months after operation
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scale
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scale
Time frame: 12 months after operation