This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at demonstrating the efficacy of device RGn600 in treating patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). RGn600 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet) and on the abdomen (abdominal belt). It combines 2 technologies: * PhotoBioModulation (PBM), which involves exposure to light from the red to near-infrared wavelengths using lasers and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) * Static Magnetic Stimulation (SMS), which consists in the application of a static magnetic field. Considering previous investigations, this innovative technology could reduce inflammation on the brain-gut axis, implicated in the development of Alzheimer's disease.
This multicentric investigation is planned to include 108 patients in France who will be followed up to 52 weeks. Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomized on a 1: 1 ratio into one of the two following treatment groups: active RGn600 device or sham device (inactivated RGn600). The site investigation teams and patients/caregivers will be blinded. The device will be applied to the patients during 26 weeks through 20-min onsite sessions following the below pattern: * 5 treatment sessions per week from Week 1 (W1) to W8 * 3 treatment sessions per week from W9 to W16 * 2 treatment sessions per week from W17 to W26 Throughout the investigation, patients will be treated per randomization with the device initially allocated by the IWRS. Follow-up will continue up to W52 ± 2 weeks At inclusion visit, after verification of the eligibility criteria, data regarding patients will be collected: demographic data, date of AD diagnosis, comorbidities, concomitant medications, sociological data. A blood sample for APOE genotyping will be also performed. Endpoints will be evaluated during 4 onsite visits at Day 0 (Inclusion, randomization to the active or sham group and first treatment session), W8 (last treatment session of), W26 (last treatment session of) and W52 ± 2 weeks. During these visits: * Patient's cognition and autonomy will be assessed through neurological scales and/or neuropsychological tests * Patient's quality of life and medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption will be assessed through questionnaires fulfilled by the patient himself/herself with the help of his/her caregiver * The safety of RGn600 will be assessed : collection of all AEs and device deficiencies, blood samples for safety analysis, clinical exams Within the context of this investigation, a biobank will be created based on blood, fecal and saliva samples of patients included by Toulouse University Hospital Gerontopole site: * Blood samples will be collected for all patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52) * Fecal samples will be collected for the first 30 consecutive patients included by this site (at D0, W26 and W52). * Saliva samples will be collected for the patients included by this site after the substantial modification approval (at D0, W26 and W52). The biobank will be located at the site. The objective of this biobank will be to perform subsequent analysis on blood samples of AD blood markers. Other analyses might be conducted on blood, fecal and saliva samples as well such as Inflammatory blood markers (iAGE), fecal microbiota and metabolome and salivary micro RiboNucleic Acid (microRNAs)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
108
RGn600 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
RGn600 inactivated
CHIC Castres Mazamet Site Autan
Castres, France
RECRUITINGCH Lavaur
Lavaur, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Lariboisière
Paris, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Broca
Paris, France
RECRUITINGBiofortis
Saint-Herblain, France
RECRUITINGToulouse University Hospital Gerontopole
Toulouse, France
RECRUITINGHôpital des Charpennes - HCL
Villeurbanne, France
RECRUITINGEvolution of patient's cognition between Day 0 and Week 26 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Absolute change (Week 26-Day 0) in ADAS-cog score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26
Evolution of patient's cognition from Day 0 to Week 8, from Day 0 to Week 52 and from Week 26 to Week 52 as measured with the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Category Naming Test (CNT)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the scores of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A \& B)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scale
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the AD Composite Score (ADCOMS)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's cognitive functions
Evolution of the score of the Digit span test
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's autonomy
Evolution of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Overall clinical response
Evolution of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of patient's Quality of life
Evolution of the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) score
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26, Week 52
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Adverse Device Effect (ADE)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Incidence of RGn600's Device Deficiencies (DDs)
Proportion of subjects with at least one Device Deficiency (DD)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Week 52)
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Complete blood count, including platelets
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of electrolytes, including calcium
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Creatinine
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of creatinine clearance
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of urea
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ASpartate AminoTransferase (ASAT)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ALanine AminoTransferase (ALAT)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of Gamma-GT
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of ALkalyne Phosphatase (ALP)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of level of safety blood markers
Change from baseline (Day 0) of level of bilirubin
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Blood pressure
Measure of Blood pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Weight
Measure of Weight (Kg)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Heart rate
Measure of Heart rate (beats/min)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of Temperature
Measure of Temperature (°C)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Evolution from Day 0 to Week 8, Day 0 to Week 26 and from Day 0 to Week 52 of ElectroCardioGram (ECG) interpretation
ElectroCardioGram (ECG) interpretation (Normal / Abnormal - Abnormality description)
Time frame: Day 0, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Medico-economic interest of RGn600 treatment with regards to healthcare consumption
Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) questionnaire filled in by the patient/caregiver.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 26
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.