Numerous studies, but not all, have suggested a positive effect of allopurinol on the cardiovascular system. The ALL-VASCOR study aims to evaluate the efficacy of allopurinol therapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk, excluding ischemic heart disease. This is particularly important due to the high cost of cardiovascular disease treatment and its status as one of the leading causes of death.
The ALL-VASCOR study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial that examines the effect of allopurinol therapy (200-500mg of allopurinol daily) versus an equivalent dose of placebo on the risk of cardiovascular events in 1,116 patients aged 40-70, with serum uric acid levels above 5mg/dL and with high and very high risk for cardiovascular disease. The ALL-VASCOR study is further designed to assess the occurrence of long-COVID syndrome. The study is directed toward both primary and secondary as well as additional endpoints. Due to the duration of the study, the planned intervention will end on July 31,2028, unless the Safe Monitoring Board or other applicable authorities decide about it. Participant recruitment for the ALL-VASCOR study is set to begin in August of 2023 and will be conducted only within Poland.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,116
The intervention will occur after randomly allocating participants to the first group (G1), in which patients will receive allopurinol at an initial daily dose of 200 mg, or to the second group (G2), where they will receive a placebo. The placebo will be prepared as tablets with the same shape and appearance as the tested drug tablets, in the appropriate doses, and containing the same excipients. Participants will initially take one tablet of the medication daily in the morning. The physicians will dispense the drugs in packs of 30 tablets for the entire interval between visits (therapy 26 weeks ± 2 weeks). The patients will receive the medications during visit V1. The drugs will be prepared in identical packages, appropriately sealed, with a number for drug identification.
Approximately 26 weeks(+/-2 weeks) after the start of the intervention, the efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated at the follow-up visit V2. Efficacy is defined as achieving a serum UA level below 5.0mg/dL for those with baseline levels \>5.0 to 7.0mg/dL or below 5.5mg/dL for those with baseline levels ≥7.0mg/dL. If insufficient therapy efficacy is noted, the initial allopurinol dose will be increased by 100mg (up to 300mg during V2). The dose may be increased by another 100mg at visit 3 and by another 100mg at the visit 4(up to 500mg during V4). In the placebo group, an appropriate preparation will be added so that the number of tablets corresponds to the group with the active substance. This treatment will be continued until the end of the bservation. Patients who meet their UA target concentration at visit V2 or V3, or V4, and those who fail to meet their target concentration at visit V4, will not have their dosing changed until the end of the follow-up.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, Wielkopolska, Poland
RECRUITINGThe occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)
The number of all causes of death, cardiac death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, coronary angioplasty or revascularization, peripheral arterial angioplasty, hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants of all-cause death
Events were adjudicated by researchers as all-cause death. The number of all-cause deaths recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Death
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as cardiac death. The number of all-cause deaths recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With stroke
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as stroke. The number of all-stroke recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With transient ischemic attack
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as transient ischemic attack. The number of transient ischemic attack recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With acute coronary syndrome
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as acute coronary syndrome,. The number of acute coronary syndrome, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With coronary angioplasty or revascularization
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as coronary angioplasty or revascularization. The number of coronary angioplasty or revascularization, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With peripheral arterial angioplasty
Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as peripheral arterial angioplasty. The number of peripheral arterial angioplasty recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure
Events were adjudicated by researchers as endpoint hospitalization (hospitalization and stay in the emergency department due to heart failure, need for intravenous loop diuretics and/or doubling the dose of oral loop diuretics). The number of hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Hospitalization
Events were adjudicated by researchers as endpoint hospitalization. The number of hospitalization for reasons other than the endpoint number 9, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.