Main objective: For a bimodal fitting (hearing aid (HA) + cochlear implant (CI)): Comparison of a tonotopy based fitting strategy (TFS4) to a default fitting strategy (FS4) for the speech recognition in noise. Secondary objectives: Comparison of TFS4 to FS4 for speech recognition in quiet. Comparison of TFS4 to FS4 for the auditory skills experienced by the subject.
Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: Each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. Bimodal hearing refers to the use of a CI in one ear with a HA on the contralateral side. This association allows for adults and children a better perception of speech in quiet and in noise, a better perception of music, hearing comfort, better sound quality, better localization of sound and, consequently, a better quality of life compared to unilateral CI alone. However, there is great variability in the integration process; while some bimodal users show substantial benefits, others receive little or no benefit. This variability could be due to the mismatch of frequencies (tonotopic shift) between the CI and the contralateral HA. Recently MED-EL has developed an "anatomy-based fitting" (ABF) strategy based on the tonotopy that allows, from a postoperative scanner, to calculate the theoretical characteristic frequency of neurons stimulated by each electrode contact and to transmit this information to the fitting software of the CI. This strategy (TFS4) could therefore allow a better integration of information in bimodal hearing and in particular improve the speech recognition in noise compared to a default strategy (FS4). Main objective: For a bimodal fitting (hearing aid (HA) + cochlear implant (CI)): Comparison of a tonotopy based fitting strategy (TFS4) to a default fitting strategy (FS4) for the speech recognition in noise. Secondary objectives: Comparison of TFS4 to FS4 for speech recognition in quiet. Comparison of TFS4 to FS4 for the auditory skills experienced by the subject. Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric randomized crossover study: Measures will be done on the patient at 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-activation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
Cochlear implant with default fitting then with tonotopy-based fitting
Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting then with default fitting
CHU Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
RECRUITINGSpeech recognition in noise
The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with the French Matrix test (Framatrix) \[S. Jansen et al. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study. Int J Audiol, 51 (3) (2012), pp. 164-173\].
Time frame: at 6 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in noise
The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with the French Matrix test (Framatrix) \[S. Jansen et al. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study. Int J Audiol, 51 (3) (2012), pp. 164-173\].
Time frame: at 12 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in quiet
Cochlear list of Lafon: list of 51 phonems (17 words). Speech recognition score on 50.
Time frame: at 6 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in quiet
Cochlear list of Lafon: list of 51 phonems (17 words). Speech recognition score on 50.
Time frame: at 12 weeks post-activation
Auditory skills experienced by the patient
Auditory skills experienced by the patient are evaluated with the short form of the French version of the speech spatial qualities scale (SSQ) with of 15 questions describing various real-world auditory situations \[Moulin et al. Ear \& Hearing 2019;40;938-950\].
Time frame: at 6 weeks post-activation
Auditory skills experienced by the patient
Auditory skills experienced by the patient are evaluated with the short form of the French version of the speech spatial qualities scale (SSQ) with of 15 questions describing various real-world auditory situations \[Moulin et al. Ear \& Hearing 2019;40;938-950\].
Time frame: at 12 weeks post-activation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.