This observational clinical, single center trial is designed to evaluate the implementation of an already validated smart monitoring device, the Philips Healthdot, on one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. This study is performed during 6 months in which all patients admitted to one surgical ward will be enrolled. Implementation is established by a step-by-step approach in which the current manually performed spot check monitoring (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, heart rate, temperature and pain score), with the early warning score (EWS), is continued besides smart monitoring with the Healthdot (respiratory rate, heart rate and physical activity) during the first three months (phase 1). This phase aims at optimizing the infrastructure, education of hospital staff and practice with application/ activation and interpretation of the device. Upward of 4 months, Healthdot monitoring will be the primary monitoring method and spot check monitoring is only performed additionally in case of doubt about clinical condition or requirement of additional vital parameters. Evaluation of the implementation will be performed with a focus group and various questionnaire regarding fidelity, acceptability, adoption, feasibility, appropriateness and costs. Thereby additional analysis regarding monitoring algorithms will be performed.
This project is a 6 months monocenter prospective cohort study at the Catharina hospital in the Netherlands. Every patient admitted to the one surgery department will receive a Healthdot. Implementation of the Healthdot will be performed stepwise. During phase 1 (month 1-3, the pre-implementation phase), the current standard method of care with manual spot checks and EWS will be continued. During this phase Healthdots will be applied only for training purposes in preparation to the implementation phase, phase 2 (month 3-6). This phase consists of primarily Healthdot monitoring and manual spot checks only if indicated. After these 6 months, the implementation will be evaluated and optimized and potentially extended. Participants: The main research population for answering the research objectives are the nurses working at the specific surgical ward at the Catharina hospital. In total amount of 500 patients, 250 during each phase, admitted to one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital will participate and receive a Healthdot as the new standard of care. These patients will sign informed consent for use of anonymized data. This population differs in age, gender, admission cause, admission duration and comorbidities but reflects the demographics of the general population on this ward which is essential to investigate implementation and prevent selection bias.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Hospitalized patients at one surgical ward will receive a Healthdot as monitoring device which will be used as primary monitoring after 3 months of preparation with education of hospital staff, improving infrastructure and training with application, activation and interpretation
Catharina hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
RECRUITINGEvaluation of the implementation of a continuous monitoring method on the surgical ward
Workload: the experienced workload for nursing staff during the implementation of the Healthdot measured with the IWS and during focus group analysis
Time frame: Conducted on a daily base during the entire study, month 1-6
Adoption
The intention and attitude towards the use of the Healthdot monitoring method. Measured with evidence-based practise attitude scale (EBPAS)
Time frame: 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
Feasibility of the Healthdot
The extent to which the Healthdot monitoring method can be successfully carried out by the healthcare employees. Measured with a thematic analysis and input from the core group (Braun and Clark)
Time frame: 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
Acceptability
The additional effort regarding the amount of spot checks per hospital admission day per patient. Calculated with data from the electronic patient file records
Time frame: Evaluated at month 4 and 6
Appropriateness
Relation between device false alarms (noise) and correct alarms based on the alarming protocol. Measured as signal to noise ratio (SNR)
Time frame: Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Usability
Number of unexpected events that occur during or result from the use of the Healthdot medical device. Measured as adverse device events (ADE)
Time frame: Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Feasibility and effectiveness
The amount of time needed to perform and process a complete manual spot check or digital monitoring check. Measured by manual time measurement
Time frame: Manual time measurement during month 1-6, 2 times a week at different days
Costs
Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the duration of admission, the associated admission costs and the monitoring method. Calculation based on provided care and associated costs
Time frame: After completing of the study at 6 months
Algorithm improvement
Advanced algorithm analyses for improved monitoring protocols with use of artificial intelligence (AI)
Time frame: After completing of the study at 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.