In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. The main goal of this study is to examine whether the implementation of a pediatric protocol under a prospective registry can increase event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of newly diagnosed patients in the participating centers.
Notably, pediatric regimens for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have resulted in better long-term outcomes, especially in the Philadelphia-negative counterpart. These regimens are essentially based on higher cumulative doses of asparaginase and the use of less myelotoxic agents, applying allogeneic transplantation only for high-risk ALL subsets. Recent metanalysis encompassing 27 clinical trials demonstrated an improved prognosis when these regimens are adopted. In adults, incorporation of these regimens has been hampered by a perception of higher toxicity and a more complex design, especially with asparaginase. Remarkably, this drug might bring side effects not usually seen with other cancer drugs, such as thrombosis, liver, and pancreatic toxicities. In addition, the incorporation of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring throughout the treatment protocol in a scheduled and standardized manner is considered paramount in the contemporary ALL treatment. Treating adult patients with acute leukemia under prospective studies allows accurate data collection and positively impacts the disease prognosis, creating a cooperative scientific environment. In Brazil, few data are available on the clinical- laboratory characteristics of ALL in adults and their outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. Few single-center reports point to a worse overall survival rate when compared to developed countries. There is great heterogeneity across the centers regarding the treatment regimens and genetic/MRD assessment. In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. At the diagnosis, a genetic characterization encompassing conventional karyotype, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular biology in our central laboratory will be performed to classify the cases. Genomic classification will include identifying Philadelphia- like B-cell ALL cases, a recent group of cases with worse prognosis, whose incidence seems higher in Hispanics. In Brazil, there is no study addressing this incidence and, more importantly, evaluating its impact on outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. MRD analysis will also be centralized to standardize and validate our flow cytometry panel in a homogeneous cohort. Additionally, the investigators plan to assess baseline factors predictive of survival and relapse and those related to major toxicities such as infections, liver toxicity, and thrombosis.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
180
60 mg/m2 D1 to D21
1.5 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22
40 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22
2000 UI/m2 D12 and D26
MTX 12 mg, Dexamethasone 2 mg, Cytarabine 60 mg D1, D8, D15, D22, D29
1000 mg/m2 D36 and D64
75 mg/m2 D36 to D39, D43 to D46, D50 to D53 and D57 to D60
30 mg/m2 D36 to D63 and D1 to D56 of consolidation
3.000 mg/m2 D8, D22, D36 and D50
30 mg/m2 D1 and D22
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
RECRUITINGOverall survival (OS)
cumulative proportion of patients alive (considering the time between the date of diagnosis and death or last follow-up)
Time frame: 4 years
Event-free survival (EFS)
time between enrollment in the study and the occurrence of any event: refractoriness after the first two cycles of induction, death or relapse.
Time frame: 4 years
Early death rate
proportion of patients who died before the first bone marrow evaluation of response (after induction I)
Time frame: 60 days
Complete response rate
proportion of patients with bone marrow aspirate with less than 5% blasts and evidence of normal hematopoiesis; CSF without blasts and recovery of peripheral blood (neutrophils≥ 1,000/μL and platelets≥100,000/μL), without the need for transfusion
Time frame: 60 days
Cumulative incidence of relapse
rate of disease relapse after CR calculated considering death as a competing event.
Time frame: 4 years
HSCT rate
proportion of patients eligible for the protocol who were able to perform the procedure in their first CR
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.