To compare the caries preventive efficacy of clinical-based, home based or E-based oral health interventions and their cost effectiveness.
Caries risk assessment and preventive measures have been performed over years with different perspectives without attention to budgeting and economic value and the preventive protocols remain uncertain for adults. caries prevention, for example using fluoride varnish, has been found only limitedly cost-effective in clinic settings, which is why alternative strategies involving home-based interventions are sought .Electronic health (E-health) interventions for patient motivation and enhancing of patient adherence, for example via reminders about the reinforcement of hygiene measures and dietary counseling as well as recall visits were found to be of value This randomized controlled clinical study aims to compare the caries preventive efficacy of clinical-based, home based or E-based oral health interventions and their cost effectiveness
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
44
topical Fluoride varnish administrated professionally every 3 months in the clinic
topical remineralizing agent (Surface Pre-Reacted Glass ionomer filler SPRG based)SHOFU company
examine the impact of Mobile application on caries prevention
Caries increment
number of carious tooth surfaces will be calculated ( DMFS score)will be monitored and recorded separately.
Time frame: 12 moths
Cost-Effectiveness
the cost effective will be calculated by the statistician (Net costs/Change in health outcome).
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
interdental cleaning(dental floss),fluoride rinse OTC (B-FRESH MOUTH WASH )