Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynecological disease, which about 50% of women develop in the course of their lives. There are many different options for surgical care, e.g. the uterus-preserving sacrospinal fixation (= sacrospinal hysteropexy = SSHP). This technique has been increasingly used in recent years. However, there is still no data on whether the fixation sutures should be performed with absorbable or non-absorbable threads. Internationally, both types of threads are routinely used and both types of threads are described in publications. So far, there is no comparative data on the effectiveness and subjective results. The aim of this study is to compare subjective symptom improvement Materials \& Methods: This is a randomized, single-center superiority study. The sacrospinal fixation is performed according to a standardized method and two different types of threads (absorbable PDS sutures vs. non-absorbable Prolene sutures) are used for the fixation suture. Patients are randomized to either the absorbable PDS sutures group or the non-absorbable Prolene sutures group. The primary outcome of interest is the subjective symptom improvement 12 months after surgery (evaluated using the German version of the pelvic floor questionnaire). Secondary outcome variables are anatomical outcomes, condition-specific quality of life, and adverse events. 52 patients will be included in the study. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and the results will be presented at scientific meetings.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
52
sacrospinous hysteropexy
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
RECRUITINGGerman pelvic floor questionnaire (subjective symptom improvement)
subjective symptom improvement 12 months after surgery evaluated using the German version of the pelvic floor questionnaire, which consist of 4 domains and a total of 42 questions
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
anatomical outcomes - POP-Q measurement
anatomical outcomes 12 months after surgery evaluated through POP-Q-system (standardised POP-Q scale ranging from 0-4; the higher the number the worse the prolapse)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
anatomical outcomes - ultrasound imaging
anatomical outcomes 12 months after surgery evaluated through ultrasound (transvaginal ultrasound to measure size of uterus, length of cervix, perineal ultrasound for 3d imaging of perineal muscles)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
German pelvic floor questionnaire (condition-specific quality of life)
condition-specific quality of life 12 months after surgery evaluated through validated german pelvic floor questionnaire (consisting of 4 domains and a total of 42 questions)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
Clavien Dindo Scale for adverse events
assessment of adverse events during the first 12 months after surgery evaluated according to the Clavien Dindo scale from 1-5, with 5 consisting death)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
Mini Nutritional Assessment
nutritional assessment 12 months after surgery (evaluated through Mini Nutritional Assessment (from 1-14 points: 12-14 points: normal nutrition, 8-11 points: at risk for malnutrition, 0-7 points: malnutrition)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
Visual Analog Scale
pain assessment 12 months after surgery evaluated through Visual Analog Scale (VAS: pictograms of facial expression at different levels ranging from free of pain, to worst possible pain)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
Numerical Rating Scale
pain assessment 12 months after surgery evaluated through Numeric Rating Scale (NRS: ranging from 0 (no pain) up to 10 (worst possible pain))
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
Patient Impression of Improvement Index
patient impression of improvment assessment 12 months after surgery evaluated through Patient Global Impression of Improvement Index (PGI-I: ranging from 1: very much better to 4: no change)
Time frame: 12 months post surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.