This study will investigate the clinical performance of a novel restorative glass ionomer (DeltaFil, DMG) in comparison to an established restorative glass ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV, SDI) in the restoration of Class II cavities in primary molars.
Dental caries (tooth decay) remains one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. It is a dynamic and continuous process that, if uncontrolled, eventually leads to cavitation and the need for restorative treatment to maintain the form and function of the tooth.Today there are many possibilities for direct restorations, e.g. resin composites, compomers, resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and glass ionomer cements (GICs), which all offer their own advantages and disadvantages. GIC are particularly suitable for treatments in young patients due to their high biocompatibility, fluoride release, less moisture and technique sensitivity as well as compatibility with Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) treatment. However, these materials have lower mechanical properties compared to other restorative materials, which negatively affects the survival rate when placed in load bearing areas. Fracture, loss and wear being the most common causes for failure. This randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the performance of the new restorative glass ionomer DeltaFil, that offers an increased fracture toughness, in comparison to an established restorative glass-ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
140
Cavities are prepared using rotary instruments/diamond burs. Afterwards, the cavity is conditioned (using DeltaFil conditioner) and cleaned, with subsequent insertion of a conventional restorative glass-ionomer (DeltaFil). During the curing phase and after finishing Riva Coat will be applied to all restoration surfaces for moisture protection.
Cavities are prepared using rotary instruments/diamond burs. Afterwards, the cavity is conditioned (using Riva conditioner) and cleaned, with subsequent insertion of a conventional restorative glass-ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV). During the curing phase and after finishing Riva Coat will be applied to all restoration surfaces for moisture protection.
University Arthur Sá Earp Neto, Dental School - Pediatric Dentistry Clinic
Petrópolis, Brazil
University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry Institute
Coimbra, Portugal
Survival rate of Class II restorations
Restorations are clinically assessed using the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. A "surviving" restoration is defined as a restoration that is still present at the time of evaluation and has no individual FDI criteria with a score of 5 (clinically poor).
Time frame: 24 months
Survival rate of Class II restorations
Restorations are clinically assessed using the FDI criteria. A "surviving" restoration is defined as a restoration that is still present at the time of evaluation and has no individual FDI criteria with a score of 5 (clinically poor).
Time frame: 6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 months
Individual FDI parameter assessment
Restorations are clinically assessed using the FDI criteria. Specifically, the following criteria are assessed individually on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "clinicially poor": Esthetic properties (Surface Luster; Surface Staining; Color Match; Anatomical Form); Functional properties (Fractures and Retention; Wear; Approximal Contact Point and Contour; Patient view); Biological properties (Postoperative Hypersensitivity \& Tooth Vitality; Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction; Periodontal Response; Tooth Integrity;Adjacent mucosa)
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.