Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation(NIBS) technique that can be used on both superficial and deep brain targets with a high spatial resolution as small as a few cubic millimeters. Neural correlates of TUS have yet been elucidated. To date, no intracranial recordings (i.e., local field potential \[LFP\]) have been captured during or after TUS in patients with movement disorders. In this study, we are aiming to profile basal ganglia LFP activity during and after TUS by using a DBS system that is capable of recording LFP. This can shed light on mechanisms of TUS, as well as allow identification of a neurophysiological biomarker that can be used to tune the TUS sonication parameters for future clinical trials.
Experiment 1: Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the sham or active stimulation group during the first study visit. In the second study visit, there will be a crossover between the groups, with all subjects undergoing one sham and one active stimulation visit before the study is completed. During the active stimulation visit, a theta burst protocol (Isppa: 30 W/cm2, burst length: 20 ms, period: 200 ms, frequency 500 kHz) will be used to sonicate the bilateral primary motor cortices (M1) or globus pallidus interna (GPi) for 2 minutes. The sham group involves sonications performed with the power set to 0 watts over bilateral M1s/GPis. In both groups, the subjects will be masked using white noise transmitted through earbuds. The targets will be identified anatomically using structural MRIs and a neuronavigation system. The Percept PC DBS system will be used to record local field potentials (LFPs) from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPI) at various time points: before (baseline) and during the sonications, as well as at 10-, 30-, and 45-minute intervals after the sonications. These recordings will be obtained while the subjects engage in a finger tapping task monitored by an accelerometer, as well as during resting periods. The power of LFPs across different frequencies will be compared and correlated with the velocity observed during the finger tapping task. Following the completion of sham and active stimulation visits, the subjects will have the opportunity to participate in an optional control group visit, which entails sonication of the occipital cortex utilizing the theta burst protocol. Experiment 2: TUS will be utilized to target the area directly over the DBS lead, while concurrently recording LFPs to identify any stimulation artifact indicative of target area-sonication engagement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
25
Bilateral M1s/GPis will be sonicated using NeuroFUS device for two minutes per hemisphere with theta burst protocol and 30 W/cm2 Isppa
Bilateral M1s/GPis will be sonicated using NeuroFUS device for two minutes per hemisphere with theta burst protocol and 0 W/cm2 Isppa
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGLFP power (Experiment 1)
The change of power of LFPs across different frequencies
Time frame: 5 minutes long recordings during both study visits at 1) Baseline (20-30 minutes before sonication), 2) during sonication, 3) 10 minutes after sonication, 4) 30 minutes after sonication, and 5) 45 minutes after sonication
Stimulation artifact (Experiment 2)
Presence of a stimulation artifact during LFP recordings
Time frame: Online during sonications
UPDRS (Experiment 1)
Change of UPDRS score
Time frame: Two assessments will be conducted during each study visit: one at baseline (within the first minute of the study) and the other upon completion of the study visit (between 120 and 130 minutes after the study visit initiation).
Finger tapping task (Experiment 1)
Correlation of LFP power change with the velocity change during finger tapping task as recorded by an accelerometer
Time frame: LFPs during finger tapping will be recorded at each visit for half minute at 1) Baseline (20-30 minutes before sonication), 2) 10 minutes after sonication, 3) 30 minutes after sonication, and 4) 45 minutes after sonication
Adverse effect profile (Experiment 1 and 2)
Presence of adverse effects as reported subjectively by the patient
Time frame: From the initiation of the study up to 1 day after its completion.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.