The primary objective of this study was to evaluate time effect on the clinical predictability of collagen matrix Xenograft (CMX) with melatonin gel versus connective tissue graft (CTG) and determine whether it is proposed to be an alternative in multiple adjacent gingival recession (MAGR) in recession type one (RT1)
this study was conducted to evaluate time effect on the clinical predictability of collagen matrix Xenograft (CMX) with melatonin gel versus connective tissue graft (CTG) and determine whether it is proposed to be an alternative in multiple adjacent gingival recession
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
22
(CMX) with melatonin in the esthetic zone using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunneling Technique (MCAT)
control group connective tissue graft using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunneling Technique (MCAT)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
interproximal clinical attachment level
measured from CEJ to base of pocket depth by using periodontal prob
Time frame: 6-9 months
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
from gingival margin to pocket depth measured by mm
Time frame: 6-9 months
Recession depth
measure from CEJ to gingival margin by mm
Time frame: 6-9 months
Keratinized tissue width
from free gingival groove to MGJ
Time frame: 6-9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.