The goal of this clinical trial is to examine if and how the implementation of point-of care-tests (POCT) for sexually transmitted infections in the management of abnormal vaginal discharge reduces the overtreatment with antibiotics in a low income country. The setting is a university hospital in a semi-rural area in Nepal and several of its rural out-reach-centers. The plan is to include 1500 women attending the gynecological outpatients with a problem of vaginal discharge over approximately a one year period. The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are: * Does POCT guided treatment result in reduced over-treatment of antibiotics, compared to the current approach in Nepal? * What are the barriers and facilitators of the acceptability of POCTs and the resulting treatment from the perspective of both patients and health care practitioners? Participants will be randomized in three groups: * standard treatment according to current practice * POCT result based treatment * POCT result based treatment plus patient education and addressing of psycho social vulnerabilities
Abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) is a common problem women seek treatment for allover the world. In low and low- middle income countries (LLMICs) about one third of these women will have a sexually transmitted disease (STI) caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG) or Trichomonal vaginalis (TV). Approximately another third will have an imbalance in the vaginal microbiotic flora, bacterial vaginosis (BV). These women and their sexual partners in the case of sexually transmitted diseases will benefit from specific antibiotic treatment. The last third of women will not have any infection and there are indications that psychosocial problems may be expressed as somatic complaints, for example of abnormal vaginal discharge in some cultures. In high income countries, with the help of laboratory-based tests, available after few days, treatment is usually with a narrow spectrum antibiotic for specific bacteria. This involves less risk for the development of antibiotic resistance. In low-income countries, laboratory testing is not feasible due to costs and logistics. Women are usually receiving antibiotic treatment with several types of antibiotics to cover STIs. More recently, point-of -care tests which are nearly as accurate as laboratory-based tests have been developed. Implementation studies for these tests in LLMICs are lacking. However, these molecular tests are still expensive. In this study the investigators propose a combination of molecular tests for the two most serious infections (CT and NG) and a cheap and simple tests for TV and BV, which both are treated with the same type of antibiotic. In addition, women attending an outpatient department in a LLMIC setting, expect (antibiotic) treatment, which they will not receive with a negative POCT. In LLMICs it is common practice to purchase over the counter medication, inclusive antibiotics. In particular for women with negative POCT results, there could be a lack of adherence to treatment recommendations. We want to examine the following research questions (RQ) in the context of treatment for vaginal discharge: 1. Can POCTs effectively reduce the use of antibiotics? A) The amount of antibiotics prescribed at the time of the appointment B) the proportion of correcly pescribed antibiotics (as defined by gold-standard tests) C) Additional antibiotics used, as reported by the patients, 2. Barriers and facilitators for patients and health practitioners with a focus on psychosocial and educational elements For this purpose, a RCT with three arms was designed: (A) Treatment as usual, (B) Treatment according to POCT results, (C) Treatment according to POCT results and additional patient information on vaginal discharge and antibiotics and screening and available counseling for psychosocial problems. The investigators plan to include 1500 women with the complaint of abnormal vaginal during a 10-12 month period at Dhulikhel hospital, a tertiary university hospital in central Nepal and selected outreach centers in 2024 and 2025. Sample size calculation are based on RQ1 and RQ2, feasibility of recruitment and the precision of the estimates, a two-sided 95 % confidence intervals (CI). For RQ1, the use of any antibiotics will be assessed in both POCT arms combined versus the treatment as usual arm (n = 1500), whilst the effect of the educational material on the use of over-the-counter medications will be assessed in the POCTplus versus the POCT group (n = 1000). As many as 85% of women with AVD are over-treated with antibiotics in LLMICs, around 50 % receive antimicrobial resistance driving antibiotics and it is expected, that around 40 % women in the POCT group will subsequently seek over the counter antibiotics. With 1500 participants randomized 1:1:1, a 10 to 20 percentage point reduction in any of these measures will produce CIs with a width between 8 and 12 % and at least 90% power. When allowing for around 40 % loss to follow-up, when assessing the use of over-the-counter antibiotics, the expected width of the CI is still around 15 %. The investigators will collect self-sampled urine and vaginal swabs from all included women and a self-administered questionnaire with a color-coded audio-computer. The questionnaire contains demographic information and a validated tool to screen for anxiety, depression and domestic violence. Gold standard testing for the STIs and BV will be performed on all women. Participants will be randomized into three arms. In the standard treatment arm, the attending health practitioner will not be informed about POCT results. In the two POCT arms, the health care practitioner will be informed about CT and NG status and about the pH, inclusive a confirmatory whiff test. Addition (22.09.2024): after the first 100 participants it was recognized, that sensitivity of the combination pH and whiff test was unacceptably low for TV for women with a high pH and negative whiff test. We will add another low cost, immunological POCT for TV for women with a high pH and a negative whiff test after the first half of participants has been enrolled. Based on our additional power calculation, we will have sufficient power to seperately analyse the diagnostic accuracy for TV both before and after the addition of this test. In the POCT-PLUS arm, patients will receive additional educational information about physiological and abnormal vaginal discharge and about potentially negative effects of antibiotic treatment. In this arm, woman screening positive for positive for anxiety, depression or domestic violence will be offered psychological counseling or referral to a crisis center Participants will be followed up telephonically after 1 and 4 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,500
Molecular, PCR based near-POCT performed by the research assistant on self -collected urine. The outcome is positive or negative
The pH of vaginal secretion is measured from a self-collected swab by the research assistant, and if above 4.5 a dropp of KOH is added. If it smells fishy, the whiff test is positive.
1. Participants screening positive for anxiety, depression or domestic violence will be offered psychological counseling or referral to a crisis management center in the POCT-PLUS arm 2. All participants of the POCT-PLUS arm receive audio- visual and written education on vaginal discharge and antibiotics
Dhulikhel Hospital
Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
Proportion of participants overtreated with antibiotics (excluding antifungals)
Comparing the proportion of women overtreated with antibiotics for treatment depending if the health care practitioner was informed about the POCT results (arm 2+3) or not (arm1). Reported by the health care practitioner. Overtreatment is defined as receiving a cephalosporin when NG is negative; a tetracycline when CT is negative; a macrolide when NT and CT are neagtive; a nitroimidazole when the gold standard test for TV or BV is negative. These subgroups are anlayzed: (a) before addition of an additional POCT for women with a pH above 4.5 and a negative whiff test, this is the first half of participants; (b) after addition of this extra test, for the second half of included participants; (c) suburban- and (d) rural clinics. We compare arm 1 with the combined arms 2+3.
Time frame: At inclusion
Proportion of participant prescribed antimicrobial resistance driving antibiotics
Comparing the proportion of women in arm 1( comparison arm) compared to arm 2 and 3 (intervention arms), receiving AMR driving antibiotics (Cephalosporins, Azithromycin, Ciprofloxacillin), depending if the health practitioner received POCT results. These subgroup analysis are planned: (a) suburban vs urban clinics. We compare arm 1 with the combined arms 2+3.
Time frame: At inclusion.
Proportion of participants adhering to treatment recommendations
Among participants, where the health practitioner had received POCT results, we compare the proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendations, depending on if they received psycho social intervention (arm 3) or not (arm2), in the arm Adherence is defined as follows: (1) participants report they took the prescribed medication, (2) no additional purchase of antibiotics; (3) no purchase of other medication for VD. Subgroup analysis for (a) suburban and (b) rural areas. (c) participants screening positive for domestic violence or (d) anxiety or depression, offered counseling or not. We compare all arms (arm1, 2 and 3)
Time frame: At telephonic follow up after 1 month.
Proportion of participants prescribed antibiotics
Comparing the proportion of participants prescribed antibiotics depending if the healthpractitioner was informed about POCT results or not. Comparing arm 1 versus arm 2+3. Following subgroup analysis: (a) first half of participants before adding another POCT for TV; (b)second half of participants after adding TV POCT; (c) suburban-; (d) rural clinic. (e) 8 antibiotic groups: tetracyclines (including doxycillin), kinolones (ciprofloxacin), macrolides (erythromycin, azitromycin), sulfonamides (trimethoprim(-sulfa), imidazolderivates (metronidazole), penicillins(including Selexid), cephalosporines, other antibiotics.
Time frame: At inclusion
Undertreatment with antibiotics for CT, NG, TV and BV with or without POCT guided treatment
We compare proportions of participants under treated for CT, NG, TV or BV, depending on , if the health practitioner received POCT results or not. Definition: of under treatment: not receiving a tetracycline or macrolide with a positive CT test, no Cephalosporin with positive Ng test, no imidazoles with a positive gold standard test for TV or BV. We compare control groups (arm 1) with the intervention groups (arm 2+3)
Time frame: At inclusion
Proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendationss
Description: Among participants, where the health practitioner had received POCT results, we compare the proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendations, depending on if they received psycho social intervention (arm 3) or not (arm2), in the arm Adherence is defined as follows: (1) participants report they took the prescribed medication, (2) no additional purchase of antibiotics; (3) no purchase of other medication for VD. Subgroup analysis for (a) suburban and (b) rural areas, participants screening positive for (c) domestic violence, (d) anxiety or depression, offered counseling or not. We compare all arms (arm 1, 2 and 3).
Time frame: At telephonic follow up 4 months after initial consultation
Does educational and psychosocial measures affect change in VD symptoms?
Comparing graded VD symptoms (3 grades), depending on if participants received educational material or psychosocial measures (in arm 3)? Subroups: (a) participants screening positive for domestic violence , (b) participants screening positive for anxiety and/or depression, (c) participants receiving counseling for anxiety and depression Overall comparison arm 1,2,3. \-
Time frame: At telephonic follow up after 4 weeks and 4 months.
Comparing prevalence of screening positive for anxiety and depression before and 4 months after consultation for VD
Change in proportion of participants screening positive for anxiety or depression 4 months after consultation for VD
Time frame: At telephonic follow up, 4 months after initial consultation
Comparing mean patient satisfaction with consultation and treatment between all RCT arms
Satisfaction with (a)consultation and (b) treatment is measured on a self-reported scale from 1-5 at the telephonic follow up interview. We will compare mean (SD) for all three arms
Time frame: At follow up after 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.