Although it represents a small percentage of the body surface, the hand is the most exposed part of the body after the face and neck and is one of the area's most frequently involved in burns. It has a social function, but above all, a functionnal one. An optimized reconstruction of this area after the burn allow the patient to recover the best possible function and increase his chances of returning to professional activity and daily life. Advances in burn treatment, such as improved resuscitation management, rapid excision of burns, skin grafting, regular dressings, and improved metabolic support, have reduced the morbidity and mortality of severe burns. However, significant challenges remain. The hand is the most frequently involved area in burns and is affected in 90% of severe burns. Hand burns requiring releasing incisions are circular, deep burns and represent a significant functional challenge. In the acute setting, current treatment options must prevent complications associated with disruption of the skin's protective function. In the longer term, these treatments should allow the regeneration of fully functional skin. However, some sequelae may persist in the form of sensory deficits, residual pain, retractile scars hindering function in this highly mobile area, or even aesthetic sequelae. The aim of our study was to perform a descriptive analysis of the aesthetic and functional sequelae related to hand burns that required acute realeasing incisions using objective and subjective tools available in the medical records (demographic, clinical and follow-up data in the context of routine care). This retrospective, non-interventional, data-driven study would provide an overview of the sequelae of hand burns with current therapies.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
Functional and aesthetic criteria : Quick DASH Score at 3 month and 6 months, Visual Analog Scale at 3 month and 6 months, scar quality (assessment by surgeon), healing (discontinuation of dressings), need for a second surgical procedure.
Edouard Herriot University hospital
Lyon, France
Functional score
Functional recovery at 3 months and 6 months after the burn (functional score, return to activities) Healing time (discontinuation of dressings). Scar quality (hypertrophic, retractile, surgical revision necessary and surgery of sequela). Burn VAS (1-10) at 3 and 6 months. QuickDASH Score at 3 and 6 months. Scar quality at 6 months. Burn VAS at 3 months and 6 months.
Time frame: Through the completion of study, average 6 months
Healing assessment
Time frame: Through the completion of study, average 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.