Engaging in regular physical activity during midlife is a key lifestyle behavior associated with reduced risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). Yet nearly half of midlife adults (48%) do not meet national physical activity guidelines. The purpose of this mechanistic trial is to identify effective goal setting techniques to enhance psychosocial processes of self-regulation for the successful promotion of PA and adherence to national PA guidelines among midlife adults, with the long-term goal of reducing AD/ADRD risk
More than 6 million U.S. adults live with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD), with projections as high as 13.8 million cases by 2050. There are no cures for AD/ADRD, making lifestyle factors key targets for reducing risk, as they account for at least a third of AD/ADRD cases. Engaging in regular physical activity (PA), particularly in midlife, is associated with reduced risk for AD/ADRD. Yet, nearly half of midlife adults (48%) do not meet national PA guidelines of 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity PA. Goal setting is a commonly used behavior change strategy to increase PA. Key psychosocial mechanisms believed to underpin the use of goal setting to promote PA include self-regulation and self-efficacy. However, the most effective goal setting technique to enhance these psychosocial mechanisms for the successful promotion of PA and adherence to national PA guidelines remains unclear. In the proposed study, the investigators will use a two-phased approach to empirically test three goal setting techniques to enhance psychosocial mechanisms of self-regulation and self-efficacy for the successful promotion of PA and adherence to national PA guidelines among insufficiently active midlife adults with obesity. In the R61 phase, a Phase 1 pilot study will establish feasibility and help refine the intervention. In the R33 phase, a Phase 2 9-month 4-arm proof-of-concept mechanistic trial (6-month active intervention and 3-month no contact follow-up) will be implemented to establish preliminary efficacy of goal setting techniques to increase PA and promote adherence to national PA guidelines. All participants will receive a Fitbit to self-monitor PA and engage in PA action planning sessions with a study interventionist. In addition, participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: i) static weekly goal of 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity PA, which most closely resembles the approach of public health campaigns and care providers; ii) weekly self-selected PA goals, which allows for self-determination and adaptation of the goal; iii) modest incremental weekly PA increase goal (i.e., researcher determined PA goal that 20% minutes/week greater than the minutes/week of PA in the previous week); or iv) non-goal setting control group. Based on Goal Setting Theory, it is hypothesized that participants in the incremental goal group will have the greatest increases in self-regulation and self-efficacy, which in turn, will lead to the greatest improvements in PA and adherence to national PA guidelines over the 9-month intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
144
Theory-driven behavioral physical activity promotion intervention.
Arizona State University
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGChange in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Participants will wear wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity monitors the activity monitor on their non-dominant wrist during all waking hours for 7 consecutive days to provide an assessment of usual activity.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6-months, 9-months
Change in Fitbit-assessed moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity
Participants will wear a wrist-worn Fitbit activity monitor daily throughout the 9-month intervention.
Time frame: Assessed daily up to 9-months
Change in self-reported moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Self-reported minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity assessed by the 7-day Physical Activity Recall.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6-months, 9-months
Change in physical activity self-regulation from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Assessed using the The 12-item Physical Activity Self-Regulation Scale (PASR-12; Umstattd et al., 2009). This scale assess 6 PA-related self-regulatory domains: self-monitoring, goal setting, eliciting social support, reinforcements, time management, relapse prevention. The range of possible scores is 5-60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-regulation.
Time frame: Assessed monthly up to 9-months
Change in physical activity behavioral strategies from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Assessed using 10-item Self-Regulation scale from the Health Belief Survey (Anderson et al., 2010) This scale assesses the use of behavioral strategies to incorporate physical activity into daily activities (i.e., take stairs instead of elevator, walking instead of driving when running errands). The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-regulation.
Time frame: Assessed monthly up to 9-months
Change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Assessed by the 12-item Exercise Self-Efficacy survey (Sallis et al.1987). The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-efficacy.
Time frame: Assessed monthly up to 9-months
Change in general self-regulation from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Assessed using the 31-item short version of the self-regulation scale (SSRS; Carey, Neal, \& Collins, 2004). The range of possible scores is 31 to 155, with higher scores indicate greater self-regulation
Time frame: Assessed monthly up to 9-months
Change in General Self-Efficacy from baseline to 6- and 9-months
Assessed using the 10-item Self-Efficacy Scale publicly available in SOBC repository \& NIH Toolbox. The range of possible scores is 31 to 155. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: Assessed monthly up to 9-months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.