Delayed SLND for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Primary Systemic Treatment

Overview

The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of SLND by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) in patients with early breast cancer planned for primary systemic therapy (PST) and whether this is affected by the timeframe of SPIO administration. For this, patients with cN0/1 disease planned for PST received radioisotope as per routine on the day of surgery or the day before, and SPIO was injected in an extended timeframe, at any point from the day of surgery to before the induction of PST. The main points to investigate are: 1. If the SPIO detection rate and concordance to the radiosotope are affected by time of SPIO injection 2. If the nodal yield and the accuracy of the procedure are affected

Superparamagnetic Iron Nanoparticles (SPIO) have shown comparable performance to the standard of Radioisotope (RI) +/- blue dye (BD) for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in breast cancer, with the advantage of clinical convenience due to easier accessibility, disposal and injection days before surgery. More interestingly, SPIO provides the possibility for delayed SLND in the setting of a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, enabling SLN detection weeks after breast surgery, only when specimen pathology has demonstrated invasive cancer, as shown in the SentiNot study. The role of SPIO for SLND in the setting of primary systemic therapy (PST) has not been extensively investigated, while the timeframe from SPIO administration to successful SLN detection in a similar fashion to SentiNot, but in the setting of PST has yet to been defined. Current evidence suggest that RI-based SLN detection is the accepted standard following PST, with RI-based dual mapping specifically recommended in cN+-to-ycN0 patients, when SLND or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) are performed, as the number of SLNs retrieved has been inversely linked to the false negative rate of the procedure. Apart from the logistic benefits of SPIO administration prior to PST, an aspect of potential interest is the ability to map the axilla, before the fibrotic changes induced by chemotherapy and lymphatic remodelling occur, that are a concern, especially in the node-positive patients at presentation. However, in this case, it is imperative to investigate that SPIO remains detectable after a prolonged period of administration and that it does not migrate to higher nodal echelons. While preliminary data suggested feasibility, the aim of this dedicated study was to investigate the width of timeframe of SPIO administration in patients undergoing PST and how SPIO-based detection and concordance to the RI are affected. In this study, patients scheduled for SLND or TAD after surgery will undergo the procedure with RI as the standard of care and will moreover receive SPIO. The administration of SPIO will take place either on the preoperative period but after the completion of PST, or before the induction of PST. The reason for this is to create a wide time-frame to allow for conclusion with regards to whether the mapping of the axilla prior PST by SPIO is a feasible technique that will then be addressed in a dedicated trial.