Producing a Novel Symptom Burden Scale for People Living With Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (ISBUS)

Overview

Development, validation of a novel symptom burden scale to assess and quantify the burden experienced by people living with Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (iMCD).

Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (iMCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder associated with systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction. The condition has an unknown aetiology and diagnostic criteria were established recently in 2017. It can be distinguished from other forms of Castleman Disease, including unicentric presentations and Multicentric Castleman Disease (MCD) that is associated with the Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus. iMCD has an estimated prevalence of between 6.9 and 9.7 people per million. While clinical presentations vary, iMCD can be associated with a high degree of symptom burden, including constitutional, gastrointestinal, neuropsychiatric, dermatologic, respiratory, and hematologic or lymphoreticular problems. Both symptoms and the side-effects of treatment can impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with iMCD This international mixed-methods study will be conducted in four stages: Stage 1: Item generation * Drawing on the content, data, and analysis from a previous international patient online survey in iMCD with 65 patients, generate draft PROM content (including a longlist of candidate draft items under existing themes) to assess symptom burden in iMCD. * Incorporate expert opinion and lived experience to achieve consensus on which items will be tested for inclusion in the symptom burden scale via an online multi-stakeholder workshop involving the funder, research team, patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) representative(s) (i.e., patients with iMCD and/or their carers), healthcare professionals, and any other relevant stakeholders. Stage 2: Item testing and refinement * Cognitive debriefing interviews with about 10 people living with iMCD to assess the content validity of the items (and associated PROM content) in terms of relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This will include assessing whether they are important/meaningful to patients. * Analyse and summarise qualitative evidence on content validity, make recommendations on revisions to the draft PROM, and agree this with the multi-stakeholder advisory group (as described above) and a separate group of PPIE collaborators. Stage 3: Final item selection * Administer the refined PROM (from Stage 2) to as wide a sample as possible of people living with iMCD. The estimated sample size is 100 patients. The PROM will be administered alongside additional sociodemographic and clinical questions and measures of burden and/or health-related quality of life (HRQoL). * Taking into account the sample size, conduct appropriate psychometric analyses in order to provide evidence for final item selection and to provide preliminary psychometric evidence on the reliability and validity of the final measure. * Taking into account all of the available qualitative and quantitative evidence, and a consultation with PPIE collaborators, agree (with the multi-stakeholder advisory group) on final item selection, with the goal of obtaining an 8-10 item measure of symptom burden. Stage 4: Preliminary measures of change * Stage 4a: Re-administer the refined PROM (from Stage 2) to participants (from Stage 3) alongside measure(s) of perceived clinical change. * Stage 4b: Conduct qualitative interviews with about 10 participants who have completed the PROM at both time points to understand what constitutes a meaningful difference from their perspective. * Triangulate quantitative and qualitative data to estimate a minimally important clinical difference (MCID) for the new PROM, agreed with the multi-stakeholder advisory group. Recruitment for Stages 2-4 will take place in USA, Canada, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Interviews will be conducted online for Stages 2 and 4 and the psychometric survey will be hosted and administered online. Governance: The results of each stage will be discussed and final decisions will be made with a multi-stakeholder group consisting of the wider research team, clinicians and other healthcare professionals and PPIE.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes

Central Contacts