Processes and Circuitry Underlying Threat Sensitivity as a Treatment Target for Co-morbid Anxiety and Depression

Phase 4RecruitingNCT06004115

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.165 enrolled

Overview

This mechanistic study uses an anti anxiety drug and brain imaging to study the threat processing system and associated brain circuits in people with depression, anxiety disorders and comorbid depression and anxiety disorders. In a double blind, placebo controlled crossover design, up to 65 individuals will be recruited who will have a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and at least one anxiety disorder (AD) (AD-MDD group), up to 65 participants will have a diagnosis of MDD and no diagnosis of an AD and up to 65 participants will have no diagnosis of MDD and a diagnosis of at least one AD will be enrolled to participate in an two session study to obtain 150 completers (50 per group). All participants will receive a single dose of Lorazepam and placebo (order randomized) taken orally. After the \~2.5 hr screening session, participants will complete two identical \~5 hr experimental sessions, each of which include a 30 min eyeblink startle session and a 1.5 hr functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan session. The total time involved in the study is approximately 10.5 hours. The main questions the study seeks to answer are: * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their eyeblink startle response to threat? * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their brain activation in response to threat? * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their responses to anxiety drugs?

This mechanistic study of major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders (AD) and comorbid anxiety and depression (AD-MDD) aims to break down threat sensitivity into acute threat (AT) and potential threat (PT). A well validated startle task (Neutral, Predictable, Unpredictable or NPU-threat task) and a cutting-edge computational functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) probe of predator escape decisions (Flight Initiation Distance or FID task) will be used to determine whether AD-MDD show increased PT or AT and how the behavioral dynamics of escape decisions are most impaired in AD-MDD. Based on prior studies, we hypothesize that AD is associated with exaggerated PT, whereas MDD is associated with blunted reward/salience responding. Thus, AD-MDD may differ from AD through blunted AT/salience (periaqueductal grey/insula circuitry and Fear-Potentiated Startle \[FPS\]) and may differ from MDD through increased PT (hippocampal - ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) - amygdala dependent circuitry and Anxiety-Potentiated Startle \[APS\]). To causally probe this circuitry, we will manipulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to demonstrate different responses in PT between these three groups, providing further evidence for PT as a targetable process. This mechanistic R01 uses a benzodiazepine within an experimental medicine approach to causally modulate the threat processing system and associated circuits in AD-MDD (N=50), MDD (N=50), and AD (N=50). After the \~2.5 hr screening session, participants will complete two identical \~5 hr experimental sessions, each of which include a 30 min electromyography (EMG) session and a 1.5 hr functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session. The total time involved in the study is approximately 10.5 hours. In a double-blind placebo crossover design, participants will receive a single 1mg dose of Lorazepam/Placebo and complete threat tasks that delineate PT/AT during startle EMG (NPU task; unpredictable vs predictable shock) and fMRI (FID task; slow vs fast threat). Specific aims of this project are: Aim 1: Determine EMG signatures of dysregulated threat processing in AD-MDD. Hypothesis 1 A (H1A): AD-MDD/AD will exhibit higher PT sensitivity (greater APS) than MDD (NPU APS: AD-MDD \> MDD; AD \> MDD). Hypothesis 1 B (H1B): AD-MDD/MDD will exhibit lower AT sensitivity (smaller FPS) than AD (NPU FPS: AD-MDD \< AD; MDD \< AD). Aim 2: Determine neural computational signatures of dysregulated threat processing in AD-MDD. Hypothesis 2 A (H2A): AD-MDD and AD will show higher hippocampal-vmPFC-amygdala responses to FID slow threat (PT) than MDD (FID slow: AD-MDD \> MDD; AD \> MDD). Hypothesis 2 B (H2B): AD-MDD and MDD will show lower periaqueductal grey/insula responses to FID fast threat (AT) than AD. (FID fast: AD-MDD \< AD; MDD \< AD). Hypothesis 2 C (H2C): Utility functions for the FID task will show both blunted reward and exaggerated threat valuation in AD-MDD, leading to less optimal choices than both MDD and AD. Aim 3: Determine the relevance of comorbidity to GABAergic manipulation of threat circuitry. Hypothesis 3 A (H3A): In the NPU task Lorazepam will decrease APS (PT) but not FPS (AT) in AD and AD-MDD but not MDD. Hypothesis 3 B (H3B): In the FID task Lorazepam will decrease neural response to slow (PT) but not fast (AT) threat and decrease the computational threat valuation parameter in AD and AD-MDD but not MDD. Significance: These aims seek to mechanistically define and pharmacologically probe process dysfunction and associated targetable circuitry unique to AD-MDD and provide evidence that AD-MDD and MDD should be separated in future clinical trials. This will also inform intervention strategies with circuit-based targets (e.g. for neuromodulation treatments) for AD-MDD, which is a large but under-served treatment resistant group.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

An individual must meet the following criteria to be considered eligible to participate in the study: Inclusion Criteria: All subjects: * Female or male sex assigned at birth; * Age 18-65; * Normal or corrected to normal vision/hearing, as protocol elements may not be valid otherwise; * Fluent English speaker, capable of providing written informed consent MDD and AD-MDD subjects: * Current major depressive episode assessed by clinician with guidance from the MINI; * Minimum score of 55 on PROMIS Depression scale AD and AD-MDD subjects: * Current anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and social phobia) assessed by clinician with guidance from the MINI; * Minimum score of 55 on PROMIS Anxiety Scale Exclusion Criteria: All subjects: * Has uncontrolled, clinically significant neurologic (including seizure disorders): cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, metabolic, gastrointestinal, urologic, immunologic, endocrine disease, or psychiatric disorder, or other abnormality, which may impact the ability of the subject to participate or potentially confound the study results; * Reported body mass index (BMI) \> 40; * History of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, as assessed by a TBI questionnaire; * History of eating disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, bipolar disorder or any sign of psychosis; * Current post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis (although history of trauma is allowed); * Current use of medications with major effects on brain function or the fMRI hemodynamic response (e.g., methylphenidate, acetazolamide, excessive caffeine intake \> 1000 mg/day) following an initial list compiled by LIBR but also assessed on a case-by-case basis. Individuals who are currently on medication (antidepressants such as SSRIs, TCAs, SNRIs, and Bupropion) and who have not undergone dose or medication changes over the past 6 weeks will be allowed to participate; * Current benzodiazepine or opiate use; * Moderate to severe current substance use disorder, defined as 5 or more symptoms of the criteria for Substance Use Disorder according to DSM 5; * Drug or alcohol intoxication (based on positive UTOX or breathalyzer test at screening or study session) or reported alcohol/drug withdrawal, last cannabis use must be \>48 hours prior to study session; * Has a risk of suicide according to the Investigator's clinical judgement or per Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or equivalent PhenX instrument, the subject scores "yes" on items 4 or 5 in the Suicidal Ideation section with referent to a 30-day period prior to Screening/Baseline or the subject has had one or more suicidal attempts with reference to a 2-year period prior to Screening; * MRI contraindications; * Is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 12 weeks after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during this time-period; * Any subject judged by the Investigator to be inappropriate for the study. MDD subjects: * Current (assessed by clinician with guidance from the MINI) anxiety disorder; * Score of \> 60 on PROMIS Anxiety Scale AD subjects: * Current or past recurrent major depressive episodes assessed by clinician with guidance from the MINI; * Score of \> 60 on PROMIS Depression scale

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Eyeblink startle magnitude under threat in AD-MDD compared to MDD.

Difference in magnitude of eyeblink startle response under threat of predictable and unpredictable shock conditions compared to neutral condition in the Neutral, Predictable, Unpredictable (NPU) Threat Task measured with electromyography. Comparing the AD-MDD group to the MDD group.

Time frame: 1-2 hours after single session placebo administration, an average of 1-5 weeks after enrollment (placebo could be session 1 or session 2)

Secondary Outcomes

Magnitude of blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) response to threat in AD-MDD compared to MDD.

Magnitude of hippocampal-vmPFC-amygdala and periaqueductal grey/insula blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) responses to fast and slow threat compared to a no threat condition in the Flight Initiation Distance (FID) Task, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Comparing the AD-MDD group to the MDD group.

Time frame: 1-2 hours after single session placebo administration, an average of 1-5 weeks after enrollment (placebo could be session 1 or session 2)

The effect of Lorazepam on eyeblink startle magnitude and BOLD response to threat in AD-MDD compared to MDD

Comparing the effects of Lorazepam to placebo (within subject) and AD-MDD to MDD (between subject) on the magnitude of eyeblink startle response under threat of predictable and unpredictable shock conditions compared to neutral condition in the NPU Threat Task measured with EMG. Comparing the effects of Lorazepam to placebo (within subject) and AD-MDD to MDD (between subject) on the magnitude of hippocampal-vmPFC-amygdala and periaqueductal grey/insula blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) responses to fast and slow threat compared to a no threat condition in the Flight Initiation Distance Task, measured with fMRI.

Time frame: 1-2 hours after single session drug administration, after both Lorazepam and sessions have been completed, an average of 5 weeks after enrollment

Processes and Circuitry Underlying Threat Sensitivity as a Treatment Target for Co-morbid Anxiety and Depression

Overview

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

Central Contacts