The overall goal of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of using a behavioral coaching intervention (Laguna Health) for optimizing post-hospital discharge care in patients with cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned into one of the study groups: the behavioral coaching intervention (Laguna Health) + usual care versus usual care alone. The Laguna Health intervention has several components: 1. Post-Discharge Recovery Coaching with a Laguna Health recovery coach to help patients identify barriers to post-discharge recovery 2. Digital psycho-educational content tailored to the needs of patients with cancer 3. Personal healthcare summaries 4. Digital content and coaching on behavioral strategies to promote self-efficacy
This is a single-center, randomized, controlled research study to test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of Laguna Health for improving post-hospital discharge care in patients with cancer. Laguna Health is behavioral coaching intervention wherein patients and their caregivers are paired with a Laguna Health recovery coach to promote post-discharge recovery. Additionally, Laguna Health offers patients and their caregivers access to a mobile platform containing psycho-educational content, healthcare summaries, and interactive features such as journaling and task lists. Participants will be randomized in 1:1 fashion to one of the two study groups: Laguna Health + usual care versus usual care alone, stratified by cancer type and therapy intent (curable solid tumor vs. incurable GI cancer vs. incurable other solid tumor vs hematologic malignancy). Participants randomly assigned to the Laguna Health group will receive access to the Laguna Health recovery coach and mobile platform for 12 weeks after they are discharged from the hospital. Participants randomly assigned to the usual care group will receive usual post-hospital discharge care as arranged by their inpatient oncology team. They will not be given access to the Laguna Health intervention. In both groups, participants are asked to complete questionnaires at baseline, weeks 6, weeks 12 and weeks 24 after enrolling in the study. It is expected that 80 patients and at most 80 caregivers will take part in this study. Laguna Health, Inc. is supporting this research study by providing funding.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
Laguna Health is a novel behavioral coaching intervention (Laguna Health) that provides supportive care to patients with cancer who are discharged from the hospital and their caregivers. The intervention includes four components: 1) behavioral coaching with a Laguna Health recovery coach; 2) digital psycho-educational content tailored to the needs of patients with cancer; 3) summary of post-discharge care tasks; and 4) behavioral strategies to promote self-efficacy.
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Feasibility of Laguna Health based on enrollment and intervention use rates
Laguna Health will be deemed feasible if at least 60% of eligible patients are enrolled in the study, and of those patients enrolled and randomized to the intervention arm, 60% engage with the Laguna Health platform during at least 7 weeks of the 12-week post discharge intervention period.
Time frame: Baseline to week-2
Acceptability of Laguna Health for patients with cancer who are discharged from the hospital
Laguna health will be acceptable to patients, defined by at least 80% of patients reporting satisfaction (score \> 20, corresponding to scale midpoint) on the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Total scores on the CSQ-8 range from 8 to 32 with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: Week-12
Acceptability of Laguna Health for caregivers of patients patients with cancer who are discharged from the hospital
Laguna health will be acceptable to caregivers, defined by at least 80% of caregivers receiving Laguna reporting satisfaction (score \> 20, corresponding to scale midpoint) on the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Total scores on the CSQ-8 range from 8 to 32 with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: Week-12
Patient Quality of Life (QOL) (FACT-G)
Compare patient QOL as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -General (FACT-G) between the two study groups longitudinally. The FACT-G is a 27-item QOL measure that assesses physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing during the prior seven days. Scores range from 0-108, with higher scores indicating better QOL.
Time frame: Baseline to week-24
Patient symptom burden (ESAS-R)
Compare patient symptom burden, as assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-R) between the two study groups. The ESAS-R is a 10-item measure that assesses various symptoms relevant to patients with cancer. The ESAS-R score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.
Time frame: Baseline to week-24
Patient anxiety symptoms (HADS-Anxiety subscale)
Compare anxiety symptoms, as assessed by the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), between the study groups. The HADS is a 14-item measure with subscales to evaluate symptoms of anxiety and depression. The HADS consists of two subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to week-24
Patient depression symptoms (HADS-Depression subscale)
Compare depression symptoms, as assessed by the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) between the study groups. The HADS is a 14-item measure with subscales to evaluate symptoms of anxiety and depression. The HADS consists of two subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with high scores indicating worse depression symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to week-24
Patient Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (PCL)
Compare post-traumatic stress symptoms as assessed through the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version between the study groups. The PCL is a 17-item PTSD Checklist that evaluates severity of PTSD symptoms. Scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
Time frame: Baseline to week-24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.