Effectiveness of Calgary family intervention model improving on uncertainty, family functioning, and resilience in caregivers of infants and toddlers undergoing open-heart surgery.Research hypothesis is The experimental group of caregivers for infants and toddlers undergoing open-heart surgery showed significant differences in uncertainty, family functioning, and family resilience before surgery, prior to transferring out of the intensive care unit, and before discharge.
Background: For caregivers of infants and toddlers with congenital heart disease, the experience of their young children undergoing open-heart surgery brings about uncertainty, including waiting for the child's recovery, providing care in the intensive care unit, and the possibility of death. These uncertainties can significantly impact the caregivers' physical and mental well-being, as well as their ability to provide subsequent care and nurture for the child. Therefore, it is crucial to implement intervention measures that focus on caring for the caregivers, reducing their sense of uncertainty, and implementing effective nursing strategies to enhance family functioning and resilience. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of implementing the Calgary Family Intervention Model on caregivers of infants and toddlers undergoing open-heart surgery in terms of reducing their uncertainty, improving family functioning, and enhancing resilience. Methods: This study adopts a quasi-experimental research design and will be conducted at a medical center in northern Taiwan. A total of 96 caregivers of infants and toddlers undergoing open-heart surgery will be recruited, and a pre- and post-test design will be employed with two groups. The control group will receive routine nursing care, while the experimental group will receive routine nursing care supplemented with the Calgary Family Intervention Model, which encompasses cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. The experimental group will participate in two therapeutic sessions: 1. The day after surgery and before visiting the child, and 2. Prior to transferring out of the intensive care unit. Both groups will be assessed using the parental uncertainty perception scale, APGAR family function assessment scale, and the family resilience scale as outcome measures. Data will be collected before surgery, prior to transferring out of the intensive care unit, and before discharge. Interviews will be conducted with the experimental group, and data analysis will involve Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. Expected contributions: In future clinical practice, this study aims to provide valuable insights into the use of family nursing intervention for caregivers of infants and toddlers undergoing open-heart surgery, specifically in managing the uncertainties associated with the illness context. Through therapeutic conversations, this intervention can help identify family strengths and resources, thereby serving as an important reference strategy for enhancing family resilience.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
64
under two brief therapeutic sessions using the Calgary Family Intervention Model. Each session lasted about 20 minutes and was conducted by a single researcher to maintain consistency. The scheduling of these sessions took into consideration the physiological and emotional stability of the participants. If any issues or difficulties arose during the course of the sessions, they could be paused. The confidentiality and privacy of the discussion content were ensured. The intervention took place in a dedicated room within the intensive care unit, providing sufficient space and privacy.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
parental uncertainty perception scale
The Chinese questionnaire consists of 30 items, categorized into four domains: Ambiguity, Lack of Clarity, Lack of Information, and Unpredictability. The scoring method is based on the Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). The possible total score ranges from 30 to 150, with the overall score being the sum of individual item scores. A higher total score indicates a greater sense of uncertainty.
Time frame: one year
APGAR family function assessment scale
The questionnaire encompasses five subscales: Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve. Each subscale consists of one question. A 3-point scoring system is employed, where "Often" is scored as 2 points, "Sometimes" as 1 point, and "Hardly Ever" as 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 10. Scores between 7 and 10 indicate a functional family, scores between 4 and 6 suggest a moderately dysfunctional family, and scores from 0 to 3 denote a severely dysfunctional family. In other words, higher scores reflect better family functionality, demonstrating the family's ability to effectively handle problems and make harmonious decisions.
Time frame: one year
family resilience scale
The content of this questionnaire consists of 31 items, categorized into three domains: Belief System, Organizational Patterns, and Family Communication Process. The scoring of the questionnaire utilizes a five-point Likert scale, ranging from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5. The scale includes responses of "Strongly Disagree" (1 point), "Disagree" (2 points), "Neutral" (3 points), "Agree" (4 points), and "Strongly Agree" (5 points). The total score range is from 31 to 155 points. Higher scores indicate greater family resilience.
Time frame: one year
Interview Outline
Interview Content Based on the research questions, design four open-ended questions to understand the effectiveness of receiving the second Calgary Family Intervention in terms of uncertainty, family functioning, and family resilience: 1. Before participating in the intervention, what were your worries and concerns about your child? After receiving the intervention, have these worries changed in terms of their intensity? (Uncertainty) 2. How was the emotional interaction within your family before the intervention? Did the intervention have any impact on your family dynamics? (Family Functioning) 3. How did your family approach crises before the intervention? How has your family's confidence in overcoming challenges changed after participating in the intervention? (Family Resilience) 4. Considering your child's entire hospitalization experience and your participation in this research intervention, do you have any suggestions or thoughts to share?
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: approximately one year.