At present, the main therapies for myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) are red blood cell and platelet transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO), androgen, and iron chelation therapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with multiple mechanisms, including direct targeting of MDS clones, immunomodulation, erythropoiesis restoration, and angiogenesis inhibition. A Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral azacitidine (AZA) in lower-risk MDS reported higher rates of hemoglobin and platelet hematological improvement in patients with AZA monotherapy. Therefore, this study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and sequential AZA in the treatment of refractory MDS-RS versus azacitidine monotherapy.
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are heterogeneous clonal disorders of stem cells that result in peripheral blood cytopenia and ineffective hematopoiesis, with the potential risk of the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) are stratified into lower-risk groups by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). At present, the main therapies for MDS-RS are red blood cell and platelet transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO), androgen, and iron chelation therapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with multiple mechanisms, including direct targeting of MDS clones, immunomodulation, erythropoiesis restoration, and angiogenesis inhibition. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) like azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC), have been shown to improve survival or delay disease progression in high-risk MDS. A Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral AZA in lower-risk MDS reported higher rates of hemoglobin and platelet hematological improvement in patients with AZA monotherapy (24.3% vs 6.5%). Therefore, this study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and sequential azacitidine in the treatment of refractory MDS-RS versus azacitidine monotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
138
10mg/d \*21 days, 28 days for 1 course
75mg/m2/d\*5 days, 28 days for 1 course
Peking union medical college hospital
Beijing, China
overall response rate (ORR)
Proportion of patients achieved complete response, partial response, and hematological improvement.
Time frame: 3, 6 months
complete response rate
Proportion of patients achieved complete response.
Time frame: 3, 6 months
relapse free survival (RFS)
Relapse free survival will be calculated from the date of response to the date of first recorded relapse or death from any cause.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Overall survival (OS)
OS is calculated for all patients from the date of initial registration to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.