In cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax liver transplantation is a definitive treatment. But a significant number of individual are ineligible for liver transplantation. In these patients to ameliorate the symptoms various treatment modalities such as TIPS, serial thoracocentesis, pigtail catheter drainage and pleurodesis are used. We are doing this study to assess the safety and efficacy of serial thoracocentesis verus pigtail catheter drainage.
* Study population - Cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax * Study design - A prospective, randomized, single center open label study * Block Randomization, block size - 10 * Sample size - Assuming in single time thoracocentesis group 5+/-3.67 thoracocentesis is required, investigator expect a 50 % reduction in pigtail drainage group. Apha error- 5, power -90, 15% dropout 35 patients in each arm * Intervention - Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis, Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD. * Monitoring and assessment * At enrollment: (A) Complete history and examination 1. Etiology of cirrhosis 2. Severity of ascites, Jaundice 3. Prior Hepatic encephalopathy, bleed, Jaundice 4. Prior Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, large volume paracentesis frequency 5. Pattern and number of prior decompensation 6. Prior Acute on Chronic Liver Failure and Acute Kidney episodes 7. Use of non selective beta blockers, norfloxaxin, rifaximin and albumin 8. History of Endoscopic Variceal ligation or other endotherapy 9. History of Hypertension, Diabetes 10. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS) 11. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema At follow-up (at daily till Day - 7, thereafter at Day - 30 and Day 90) Complete history and examination 1. Complications - SBP, SBE, ACLF and Jaundice, HE/ AKI episodes 2. HTN, Diabetes control 3. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS) 4. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema, ascites, HE Clinical Evaluation 1\. Etiology of chronic liver disease (Baseline) 2. Severity of liver disease (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 3. MELD score, MELD-Na score, CTP score (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 4. Complications (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 5. Overt HE, PHT related Bleed, clinical jaundice, ascites, hyponatremia, AKI, SBP, Infection (specify site and severity), Frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis, On Demand Thoracocentesis * Labs and follow up Baseline (at admission) - 1. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP, PCT, S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na 2. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO 3. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, Protein, Sugar, SPAG, SAAG, ADA, c/s 4. Hemodynamics : Intrapleural pressures at first TT 5. Baseline (at randomization, Day -3 and Day - 7 in PCD-TT) - 6. Blood : KFT, INR; S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na (at Day 7) 7. Imaging : X-ray chest 8. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, SPAG, c/s if indicated 9. Day - 60, Day - 90 (end of follow-up) 10. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP 11. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO * STATISTICAL ANALYSIS - 1. Data will be reported as mean + SD. 2. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test 3. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t test 4. Non normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data). 5. The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. 6. A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. 7. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable. * Adverse effects - Chest pain, pain at the site, Breathlessness, infection, pneumothorax, infection, bleeding * Stopping rule - 1. Liver Transplant 2. Appearance of SBP, PICD, HE. 3. Mortality 4. End of follow-up
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Pigtail Catheter
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Frequency of Repeated Thoracocentesis
Time frame: Day 30
Frequency of Repeated Thoracocentesis
Time frame: Day 90
Incidence of refilling hydrothorax within
Time frame: 72 hours
Frequency of Repeated Thoracocentesis.
Time frame: Day 30 and Day 90
Rate of Complete Response, Partial Response, No response.
Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Number of times Thoracocentesis is required between both groups at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Number of times Thoracocentesis is required between both groups at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of pateint developing Post thoracocentesis Shock (Change in Heart Rate, Blood pressure) at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Change in Renal parameters - Serum Creatinine at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Hepatic encephalopathy: Grading as per West Haven Classification.
West Haven Grade (1-4) will be used to assess Hepatic Encephaloapthy, Grade 4 means worse outcome.
Time frame: Day 7
Hepatic encephalopathy: Grading as per West Haven Classification.
West Haven Grade (1-4) will be used to assess Hepatic Encephaloapthy, Grade 4 means worse outcome.
Time frame: Day 30
Hepatic encephalopathy: Grading as per West Haven Classification.
West Haven Grade (1-4) will be used to assess Hepatic Encephaloapthy, Grade 4 means worse outcome.
Time frame: Day 90
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of participants developing Na < 120 meg/l Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Dose of Diuretic in each arm Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patient developing Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients developing Spontaneous Bacterial Empyema Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
No. of days pateint surviving without Liver transplant and TIPS at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Incidence of Post procedure complications in between both groups at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Changes in MELD between the groups
Time frame: Day 7
Changes in MELD between the groups
Time frame: Day 30
Changes in MELD between the groups
Time frame: Day 90
Changes in CTP between the groups
Time frame: Day 7
Changes in CTP between the groups
Time frame: Day 30
Changes in CTP between the groups
Time frame: Day 90
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 7
Time frame: Day 7
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 30
Time frame: Day 30
Number of Episodes of Hospitalization between both groups at Day 90
Time frame: Day 90
Cumulative dose of albumin at D7 in two groups
Time frame: Day 7
Cumulative dose of albumin at D30 in two groups
Time frame: Day 30
Cumulative dose of albumin at D90 in two groups
Time frame: Day 90