Sepsis is organ dysfunction secondary to an inappropriate host response to infection. In the most severe cases, circulatory failure necessitating the introduction of vasopressor therapy is called septic shock. Sepsis and septic shock are life-threatening systemic organ dysfunctions requiring hospitalization in a critical care unit. According to several studies, sepsis accounts for around 30% of patients in these units. In this patient population, mortality in the critical care unit or in hospital is 25.8% and 35.3% respectively. Among the organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis, striated skeletal muscle damage is frequent and possibly severe. The literature refers to this as sepsis-induced myopathy, and describes three main mechanisms: mitochondrial dysfunction, exacerbated proteolysis and altered muscle membrane excitability. Of all the striated skeletal muscles that can be affected, the diaphragm and the muscles of the thoracic and abdominal wall play a major role in breathing. The diaphragm remains the main muscle involved in breathing. Its physiology is twofold. Firstly, through its contraction, the diaphragm is responsible for the lateral movement of the lower ribs, thus increasing the transverse diameter of the thorax. This first action is commonly referred to as "insertional". At the same time, lowering the phrenic center of the diaphragm increases abdominal pressure. Its distinctive upwardly convex domed appearance means that it is intimately in contact with both the chest wall and the abdominal cavity. This particular area of contact is called the apposition zone. It is on this zone, under the action of the abdominal compartment, that positive pressure also generates an outward thrust from the medial face of the lower ribs, a second action commonly referred to as "appositional". A number of studies, including that carried out by our team (US\_DIAMONDS, NCT 02474797), have identified a high prevalence of diaphragmatic damage in patients with sepsis or septic shock. This can be as high as 60%. This diaphragmatic dysfunction would then be associated with a higher mortality rate in hospital and at D90 of discharge. The clinical evolution of post-resuscitation patients remains a little-studied subject. However, patients may present muscle dysfunctions in the longer term after a stay in intensive care. In our study, we demonstrated that less than half of patients recovered from diaphragmatic dysfunction on discharge from the critical care unit. In addition, Borges RC et al. found a significant decrease in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris at discharge, compared with the same measurement taken at D+2 of admission to the critical care unit. Finally, the impact of muscle dysfunction on dyspnoea during sepsis and after its resolution is uncertain. Similarly, the impact of muscle dysfunction and dyspnoea on quality of life is unknown. Sepsis is associated with muscle dysfunction of multiple mechanisms. The aim of this study is to assess the immediate and longer-term impact of muscle dysfunction on muscle, dyspnea and quality of life in patients with abdominal sepsis ("Abdominal sepsis" group) and patients with extra-abdominal sepsis ("Extra-abdominal" group). Depending on the location of sepsis, this study will enable us to assess and potentially confirm the preferential effect of abdominal sepsis on diaphragm function.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
86
The specific research procedures correspond to the addition of : * Two additional ultrasound examinations, i.e. at discharge from intensive care and 3 months after hospital discharge: non-invasive examination (duration 20 minutes). Ultrasound is a risk-free, painless procedure involving the placement of an ultrasound probe on the body part under investigation, without the need for a radius or puncture. * Questionnaires to assess quality of life (SF-36) and functional impact (LCADL) of dyspnea, carried out at discharge from hospital and at 3 months (duration 15 minutes).
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, France
RECRUITINGDiaphragm thickening function
This outcome corresponds to the difference in mean ultrasound diaphragm thickening fraction between ICU discharge and 3 months after hospital discharge.
Time frame: Month 3
Function of thickening the diaphragm during inspiratory efforts
This outcome corresponds to the difference in mean between the two groups in the fraction of diaphragm thickening, on ultrasound, within the first 72 hours of admission and on discharge from the intensive care unit.
Time frame: Month 1
Evolution of diaphragm mobility during inspiratory efforts
This outcome corresponds to the difference in diaphragmatic excursion means within the first 72 hours of admission, at discharge from intensive care and 3 months after hospital discharge.
Time frame: Month 3
Evolution of intercostal, transversus abdominis and oblique abdominal muscle function
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of thickness of intercostal, transverse and oblique abdominal muscles within the first 72 hours of admission, on discharge from intensive care and 3 months after hospital discharge.
Time frame: Month 3
Evolution of the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris on ultrasound
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris within the first 72 hours of admission, on discharge from the intensive care unit and 3 months after hospital discharge.
Time frame: Month 3
Evolution of the structure of the various muscle groups assessed by ultrasound
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of gray levels on image captures of different muscle groups using Image J software®.
Time frame: Month 3
Global measurement of dyspnea
This outcome corresponds to theVAS-Dyspnea comparison (numerical scale from 0 to 10) within the first 72 hours of admission to intensive care, at discharge from intensive care, at discharge from hospital and 3 months after discharge from hospital.
Time frame: Month 3
Functional impact of dyspnea
This outcome corresponds to london chest activity of daily living scale at hospital discharge (estimate of previous condition) and 3 months after discharge. london chest activity of daily living
Time frame: Month 3
Short Form-36 Questionnaire of Quality of life
This outcome corresponds to the Short Form-36 comparison at hospital discharge (estimate of previous condition) and 3 months after discharge.
Time frame: Month 3
Relationship between diaphragm function and dyspnea, and quality of life
This outcome corresponds to the correlation between diaphragm thickening fraction and LCADL scale, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire physical score.
Time frame: Month 3
François Philippart, MD
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.