Kidney transplantation improves the health and quality of life for those Veterans with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). While early patient and graft survival are excellent, long-term outcomes continue to be challenging. Patient death with existing kidney graft function occurs in about half of all recipients over time. This is primarily due to the development of cardiovascular disease in a patient population with multiple preexisting cardiac disease risk factors. There has been little progress in improving outcomes in this area for over two decades. Recent studies in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients using SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), regardless of the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), results in both kidney protective and cardiac protective impacts and improved patient outcomes. However, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) were excluded from these clinical trials due to concerns that these agents promote infection, diminish graft function, and may alter immunosuppressive drug levels that are the mainstay of patient's transplant therapy. There are limited published data of SGLT2i treatment of selected KTRs.
Background: Kidney transplantation improves the health and quality of life for those veterans with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). While early patient and graft survival are excellent, long-term outcomes continue to be challenging. Patient death with existing kidney graft function occurs in about half of all recipients over time. This is primarily due to the development of cardiovascular disease in a patient population with multiple preexisting cardiac disease risk factors. There has been little progress in improving outcomes in this area for over two decades. Recent studies in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients using SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), regardless of the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), results in both kidney protective and cardiac protective impacts and improved patient outcomes. However, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) were excluded from these clinical trials due to concerns that these agents promote infection, diminish graft function, and may alter immunosuppressive drug levels that are the mainstay of patient's transplant therapy. There are limited published data of SGLT2i treatment of selected KTRs. Objective: The goal of this submission is to examine the safety and efficacy of SGLT2i therapy in Veterans with KTRs with and without T2DM. The hypothesis is treatment with SGLT2i will lead to improvements in graft and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease, with acceptable side effect profile. Methods: To test this hypothesis, the investigators will execute a multicenter clinical trial at 5 VA medical centers, including 4 that serve as primary kidney transplant programs. The multidisciplinary research team includes transplant medical and surgical expertise, diabetology, and informatics and statistical support familiar with VA data systems. In open label fashion, the investigators will treat eligible KTRs and comprehensively assess adverse and serious adverse event data, as well as assess any untoward impacts on graft function and diabetes management. Secondly, the investigators will utilize VA data from the VINCI corporate data warehouse to develop a control cohort of Veterans with KTRs with and without T2DM, not treated with SGLT2i. The investigators will utilize propensity score matching to reduce bias that may occur in observational studies. With this strategy, the investigators will further address the potential beneficial impact of SGLT2i treatment on cardiovascular outcomes, as well as kidney disease progression in the transplanted kidney. The investigators will also analyze the cost impact of using this agent in this patient population, in terms of hospitalizations, unanticipated procedures, and CKD management. Findings: These studies will provide new information to the transplant community for both Veteran and non-Veteran alike, with a detailed assessment of safety and feasibility of this agent class using a pragmatic approach to transplant care. These results will translate into an opportunity to mitigate late graft loss in this patient population, and a potential breakthrough in clinical care that to date has been unrecognized.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
264
SGLT2 Inhibitor
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Hines, Illinois, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
RECRUITINGOmaha VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
RECRUITINGVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGTennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
RECRUITINGDiscontinuation of Empagliflozin
The incidence of therapeutic discontinuation of empagliflozin in the kidney transplant recipient from time of initiation.
Time frame: about 2 years
Infection
Defined as the cumulative incidence of study defined Grade 3 or higher infection of the urinary tract or perineum after initiation of treatment.
Time frame: about 2 years
Hypoglycemia
The cumulative incidence of grade 3 hypoglycemia
Time frame: about 2 years
Major cardiorenal events
Time to first occurrence of the composite of major adverse cardiorenal events (MACER) as defined as all-cause mortality, stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure events including hospitalization for CHF or urgent CHF treatment, sustained (for at least 3 months) 40% decline in eGFR, or allograft failure as defined by chronic dialysis, re-transplantation, or persistent eGFR \<15mL/min/1.73m2)
Time frame: about 2 years
Acute Graft Dysfunction
The cumulative incidence of \>15% elevation in serum creatinine for more than 4 weeks from the baseline defined prior to treatment.
Time frame: about 2 years
Volume Depletion
The cumulative incidence of grade 3 volume depletion.
Time frame: about 2 years
Acute Cellular Rejection
The cumulative incidence of acute rejection biopsy proven using 2017 criteria: Type IA Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate interstitial inflammation t2i2 or t2i3 Type IB Severe tubulitis and at least moderate interstitial inflammation t3i2 or t3i3 Type IIA Mild to moderate intimal arteritis v1 Type IIB Severe intimal arteritis (\> 25% of the luminal area) v2 Type III Transmural' arteritis and/or fibrinoid necrosis v3 Borderline: no intimal arteritis is present, t\>0 and i1 or i2/i3 and t1
Time frame: about 2 years
Amputation and foot ulceration
The cumulative incidence of Grade 3 foot ulceration and/or need for amputation.
Time frame: About 2 years
Proteinuria
Spot Urine Protein/creatinine ratio
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
Allograft Biopsy
Time to incidence of a decline in eGFR sufficient to trigger a clinical decision for an allograft biopsy
Time frame: about 2 years
MACER
Time to first occurrence of individual component of the MACER secondary outcome
Time frame: about 2 years
Death
Time to the occurrence of cardiovascular death
Time frame: about 2 years
Acute graft dysfunction
Time to acute kidney injury as defined as a \>15% change in eGFR from baseline
Time frame: About 2 years
Slope of kidney function
Serum creatinine measured in mg/dL for all participants prior to treatment, at month 6, month 12 and month 24 of treatment.
Time frame: over 2 years
Glycemic Control
Changes in Hemoglobin A1C over time of treatment
Time frame: over 2 years
Body Weight
Change in body weight over time of treatment
Time frame: over 2 years
Blood Pressure
Change in blood pressure measured in mmHg over the course of the study
Time frame: over 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.