This study is a pilot randomized trial of STIckER in which 40 providers (20 trained in using the STIckER decision aid and 20 providing standard care) will enroll a total of 140 sexually active young Emergency Department (ED) patients over six months in a pediatric and adult ED setting. The primary goal is to determine if sexually active young individuals who use STIckER are more likely to undergo STI testing. By developing an effective automated digital tool to increase STI testing, the investigators aim to improve evidence-based sexual health education, reduce STI rates, and enhance the health outcomes of young individuals nationwide.
Improving sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening is vital to combat the STI epidemic, especially among adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 15-24 years in the United States. Inadequate testing for STIs in different body areas contributes to disease transmission. Emergency Departments (EDs) treat a significant number of young individuals, many of whom come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds and minority communities. Previous research has shown inconsistent use of contraception in this population, and despite the willingness of ED providers to support sexual health interventions, time and resource limitations present implementation challenges. To address this issue, the investigators propose developing STIckER (STI ChecK in the ER), a digital patient decision aid for STI testing in the ED that promotes shared decision-making. STIckER involves three steps: (1) patients complete a nonjudgmental sexual health screening assessment by scanning a quick-response (QR) code, (2) educational modules facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) by connecting personalized STI risk with evidence-based testing recommendations, and (3) a confidential, color-coded digital infographic aids the patient-provider discussion on STI testing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
184
STIckER is an interactive and personalized intervention based on the principles of SDM that has been designed with input from the AYA ED patients and providers. STIckER guides AYA patients through a series of steps, beginning with "scanning your STIckER." Participants complete risk assessments, SDM modules, and conclude with an anonymous final digital infographic that informs an SDM conversation with the medical provider. This decision aid seamlessly integrates into the ED workflow, recommending appropriate STI testing for high-risk individuals and using SDM concepts for those at intermediate risk.
After enrollment but before the start of their clinical visit, AYA participants assigned to a provider in the control arm will scan a QR code. They will receive a prompt stating, "If you would like to be tested for a sexually transmitted infection today, please tell your medical doctor."
Children's Hospital of New York (CHONY)
New York, New York, United States
Milstein Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital /Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
ED STI Testing Rate
Percent of individuals with any gonorrhea or chlamydia testing performed in the ED on the day of their STIckER visit.
Time frame: Day 0
Extragenital STI testing Rate
Percent of individuals with any gonorrhea or chlamydia extra-genital (pharyngeal or rectal) test performed in the ED on the day of their STIckER visit.
Time frame: Day 0
Genitourinary STI testing Rate
Percent of individuals with any gonorrhea or chlamydia genitourinary test performed in the ED on the day of their STIckER visit.
Time frame: Day 0
STI Positivity Rate
Percent of individuals testing positive for gonorrhea or chlamydia at any site.
Time frame: Day 0
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score
Acceptability assessed by a four item questionnaire with each question scored from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scores to each question are averaged to determine a mean score, ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: At completion of all patient visits (within 6 months of enrollment)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score
Appropriateness assessed by a four item questionnaire with each question scored from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scores to each question are averaged to determine a mean score, ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: At completion of all patient visits (within 6 months of enrollment)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Score
Feasibility assessed by a four item questionnaire with each question scored from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scores to each question are averaged to determine a mean score, ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: At completion of all patient visits (within 6 months of enrollment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.