The goal of this clinical trial is to find out at which lower limit for saturation (amount of oxygen in the blood) we can best give extra oxygen to children that have been admitted for shortness of breath. We hope to accomplish a shorter period of illness for these children and that they can be discharged home earlier. Participants will receive supplemental oxygen if their blood oxygen levels are below 88% or below 92%. After admission, (parents of) participating children will fill out questionnaires. We will compare the two groups on their hospitalization duration and recovery. In other words, is it better to maintain a lower limit of 88% saturation or a lower limit of 92% in children admitted for shortness of breath?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
560
Oxygen saturation threshold on which supplemental oxygen is decided
Spaarne Gasthuis
Haarlem, North Holland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGCanisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Netherlands
RECRUITINGRijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Netherlands
RECRUITINGAmphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, Netherlands
RECRUITINGMartini Ziekenhuis
Groningen, Netherlands
RECRUITINGTergooi Ziekenhuis
Hilversum, Netherlands
RECRUITINGSt Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
RECRUITINGFranciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland
Rotterdam, Netherlands
RECRUITINGIsala Klinieken
Zwolle, Netherlands
RECRUITINGTime to meeting all discharge criteria
Time in hours from admission to meeting all discharge criteria Discharge criteria include: * No need for supplemental oxygen for 4 hours, including a period of sleep for children aged \< 2 years * Clinically fit for discharge with normal or minimally increased respiratory rate AND no or mild respiratory distress, as judged by nurses and physicians using the Parshuram et al scoring system, commonly used in Dutch paediatric practice as part of the Pediatric Early Warning Scale\]. * No need for in-hospital feeding or medication by nasogastric tube (NGT). * No need for in-hospital intravenous treatment. * No need for in-hospital nebulized bronchodilator treatment. * No need for in-hospital treatment with metered dose inhalator inhalations more often than every 3 hours. * No need for high flow delivered by high flow nasal cannula or nasal prongs.
Time frame: Discharge criteria are checked daily during admission up to discharge (generally a few days up to a week but longer if admission lasts longer) and the time and date at which all discharge criteria have been met will be recorded.
Length of stay
Time from admission to discharge in hours
Time frame: During admission
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissions
Number of PICU admissions per group
Time frame: During admission
Time on oxygen therapy
Time in hours spent on supplemental oxygen
Time frame: During admission
Duration of symptoms
Measured as days from admission to having met all of the following criteria: resolution of cough, resolution of dyspnea as indicated by parent, cessation of scheduled bronchodilator use.
Time frame: from admission to 90 days after discharge
Return to normal health
Measured as days from admission to parent reported normal health. Upon discharge parents/patients are asked to record the last day of illness and report this in the follow-up questionnaires
Time frame: from admission to 90 days after discharge
Time to return to school/daycare
Measured as days from admission to parent reported return to school/daycare
Time frame: from admission to 90 days after discharge
Unscheduled health care visits or admissions after discharge
Number of unscheduled visits or admissions up to 28 days after discharge
Time frame: from admission to 28 days after discharge
Patient quality of life
Measured by digital questionnaire of EQ-5D-Y (modified versions are used in agreement with EuroQol for patients \< 4 years)
Time frame: at discharge, 7, 28 and 90 days follow-up
Overall pediatric health
ICHOM PROMIS Pediatric Global Health set
Time frame: at discharge, 7, 28 and 90 days follow-up
Parental anxiety
by anxiety items of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time frame: at discharge, 7 and 28 days follow-up
Economic evaluation
The aim of the economic evaluation is to relate the incremental costs of an SpO2 of 88% (intervention) in comparison with an SpO2 of 92% (control) to the incremental health effects. Both a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a societal and healthcare perspective
Time frame: Up to 90 days after discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.