Using the Subglottic Pressure to Predict the Dysphagia After Partial Laryngectomy

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital50 enrolled

Overview

Recruited patients are divided into two arms depending on laryngeal carcinoma's T1 and T2 stages. Two interventions were undergone, including transoral endoscopic laser cordectomy and open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL). During the pre-and post-operative time, patients performed measurements of swallowing function, including direct subglottic pressure, Eating Assessment Tool-10(EAT-10) questionnaire, swallowing ability to different textures, and fiberoptic evaluation of swallowing(FEES). Patients undergo subglottic pressure measurement and swallowing function evaluation three times: 3-7 days, two months, and six months after surgery. Patients also performed measurement voice acoustic analysis and subjective assessment one-day pre-operation and six months post-operation.

There were swallowing disorders after partial laryngectomy in most patients with laryngeal carcinoma. At least these patients need several months to recover. Few people required surgery of total laryngectomy to maintain normal swallowing function. The swallowing training cannot acquire a valid swallowing function and take the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Factors that influenced the swallowing function recovery, for example, the time of nasogastric feeding and tracheostomy tube removal, were affected by age and diabetes. On the other hand, the pharynx size of a CT scan can predict the recovery of swallowing function after laryngectomy. But those are not directly related to swallowing motion, although they are predictors of dysphagia. The investigators will perform the study with swallowing function measures to find predictors relative to swallowing function and evaluate dysphagia's recovery early. Subglottic pressure is a protective factor that can reduce aspiration risk. This research will measure the subglottic pressure after laryngectomy and predict or monitor swallowing disorders. Specific objectives were to verify the effect of laryngectomy on subglottic pressure.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

Interventions

Open partial horizontal laryngectomy(OPHL), Type I-IIIPROCEDURE

An open partial horizontal laryngectomy(OPHL) was performed for patients with T2 supraglottic and glottic carcinoma, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) criteria. Type I OPHL: Entails the resection of the supraglottis, including the pre-epiglottic space and the upper half of the thyroid cartilage. Type II OPHL: Entails the resection of the entire thyroid cartilage, with the inferior limit represented by the upper edge of the cricoid ring. Type III OPHL: Entails the resection of the entire supraglottic, glottic, and part of the subglottic sites, sparing both or at least one functioning crico-arytenoid unit.

Transoral endoscopic laser cordectomyPROCEDURE

For patients with T1 glottic laryngeal carcinoma, according to the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC), transoral endoscopic CO2 laser(2-40Watts) cordectomy was performed. The classification comprises eight types of cordectomies: * A subepithelial cordectomy (type I) is a resection of the epithelium of the vocal fold. * A subligamental cordectomy (type II) is a resection of the epithelium, Reinke's space, and vocal ligament. * Transmuscular cordectomy (type III), which proceeds through the vocalis muscle. * Total cordectomy (type IV). * Extended cordectomy encompasses the contralateral vocal fold and the anterior commissure (type Va). * Extended cordectomy, which includes the arytenoid (type Vb). * Extended cordectomy, which encompasses the subglottis (type Vc). * Extended cordectomy, which consists of the ventricle (type Vd).

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Age: 18-80 years * Surgical treatment by open partial horizontal laryngectomy type I or II and transoral laser cordectomy for squamous cell carcinoma * Availability of clinical data * Validity of normal swallowing of thin liquids Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe heart disease, and psychopathy or mental disease * Surgery complications(such as sepsis, pharyngocutaneous fistula, surgical revision) * Radiotherapy histology * Swallowing disorder or trachea aspiration before surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fiberoptic laryngoscope evaluation of swallowing

The patient, in a sitting position, had to swallow liquid. The tip of a flexible endoscope was positioned beyond the soft palate, and the pharyngeal phase of swallowing was studied, recording videos and images for further analysis. In particular, according to the severity scale, the scores ranged from 1 point (no materials entered the airway) to 8 points (the material penetrated below the vocal cords, but no effort was made to eject the material), representing the severity of risk for penetration

Time frame: Pre-operation, one week post-operation, two months post-operation, six months post-operation

direct subglottic pressure

Subglottic pressure was measured while swallowing a thinned solution with and without airflow delivery through the subglottic puncture needle. The unit of subglottic pressure is cmH20.

Time frame: At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery

EAT-10 questionnaire

The EAT-10 questionnaire consists of a 10-item questionnaire with a maximum total score of 40 points. All items are rated on a 5-point scale in which 0 indicates no problem, and 4 indicates a severe problem in swallowing function. An EAT-10 score of over 3 is abnormal and indicates a higher self-perception of the presence of dysphagia.

Time frame: At one day before surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery

Swallowing ability to four different textures

An early 5-point scoring system (score one corresponding to the early postoperative assessment) was applied to each patient depending on his ability to swallow one to four different textures (liquid, semi-liquid, semi-solid, and solid). A score of 0 is poor (no power to swallow), while a score of 4 is good.

Time frame: At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes

Voice acoustic analysis

Every participant was asked to phonate a sustained vowel /a/ at a habitual comfortable pitch and intensity for voice pitch, quality assessments, and habitual vocal intensity. The recordings were made in a quiet clinical room. The participant sat in front of a microphone positioned approximately 10cm from the left corner of the mouth. The voice signal coupled with Roland's Audio interface with a sampling rate of 44k-Hz and 16-bit accuracy. The signal was stored in a computer system after collecting sustained vowels. The voice signals were analyzed using speech analysis software. The stable phase of the voice sample was extracted for analysis. The 3,000-msec sample was analyzed for acoustic parameters. The voice acoustic parameters include F0 (fundamental frequency) in Hertz(Hz), percentage of jitter(%), percentage of shimmer(%), Harmonic to noise ratio(HNR), and intensity in decibels(dB).

Time frame: At one day before surgery, six months after surgery

The time in weeks of nasogastric feeding

The duration of surgery to oral feeding after withdrawing naso tube.

Time frame: At two months after surgery, six months after surgery