High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Reducing The Rate of Reintubation

Overview

This is study aim to compare between high flow nasal canula (HFNC) and non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in reducing the rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated patient with successful weaning

* High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy comprises an air/oxygen blender, an active humidifier, a single heated circuit, and a nasal cannula. It delivers adequately heated and humidified medical gas at up to 60 L/min of flow and is considered to have a number of physiological effects: reduction of anatomical dead space, positive end expiratory pressure ( PEEP ) effect, constant fraction of inspired oxygen, and good humidification * Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation is a safe and effective means of improving gas exchange in patients with many types of acute respiratory failure . for example, adding noninvasive ventilation to standard therapy decreased the need for endotracheal intubation...For patients assigned to noninvasive ventilation, the ventilator was connected with conventional tubing to a clear, full-face mask with an inflatable soft-cushion seal and a disposable foam spacer to reduce dead space .After the mask had been secured, pressure support was increased to achieve an exhaled tidal volume of 8 to 10 ml per kilogram, a respiratory rate of fewer than 25 breaths per minute, the disappearance of accessory muscle activity (as evaluated by palpation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle), and patient comfort * The effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on adult patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) are controversial. The investigators aimed to further determine the effectiveness of HFNC in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation in adult patients with ARF by comparison to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes

Central Contacts