This study compares the diagnostic capability of a millimeter-wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System to the gold standard polysomnography.
The gold standard for the diagnosis of sleep breathing disorders is polysomnography (PSG), which requires contact sensors, in-lab monitoring and manual scoring by experts, limiting the comfortability of patients and accessibility of diagnosis. A novel contactless millimeter-wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System is developed, in order to assist sleep staging and the diagnosis of sleep breathing disorders. The Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System is capable of collecting, recording, storing and analyzing breathing, heartbeat, spatial distribution of full-body movements, etc. via a millimeter-wave radar, and oxygen saturation, pulse, etc. via a pulse oximeter. A dedicated algorithm enables the system to detect respiratory events and estimate sleep stages based on the collected data. The device and algorithms are to be validated in this study by comparison with PSG.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Millimeter-Wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System to be used on each participant undergoing PSG
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGDiagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥5) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 5 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Time frame: Day 1
Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥15) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 15 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 15 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Time frame: Day 1
Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥30) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 30 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Time frame: Day 1
Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥5) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) \< 5 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI \< 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 1
Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥15) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) \< 15 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI \< 15 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Time frame: Day 1
Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥30) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)
The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) \< 30 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI \< 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
ICC between AHI according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and AHI according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Total Sleep Time (TST)
ICC between TST according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Deep Sleep Proportion
ICC between the proportion of deep sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage N3 sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Light Sleep Proportion
ICC between the proportion of light sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage N1 sleep time plus stage N2 sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Time frame: Day 1
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Proportion
ICC between the proportion of REM sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage R sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.
Time frame: Day 1