This study aims to evaluate clinically the efficacy of flurbiprofen gel in comparison to Aloe Vera gel as adjunctive to SRP in the reduction of periodontal pockets in patients with chronic periodontitis in smoking patients. All patients will receive SRP prior to treatment. * Group 1: one site will receive flurbiprofen while the contralateral site will receive a placebo * Group 2: one site will receive aloe vera while the contralateral site will receive a placebo * Group 3: one site will receive flurbiprofen while the contralateral site will receive aloe vera Researchers will compare the inter and intra-groups differences to check if there's a variation in the periodontal parameters measured.
Complete medical and dental histories as well as informed consent will be collected from eligible participants, and periodontal charting will be done for them. Medical history and laboratory screening for all patients will be carried out at baseline. All participants will undergo scaling and root planning. The selected patients will be allocated into three groups with the help of a computerized randomizer (Randomizer.org) and sites will be assigned as control or test based on a coin flip method: * Group 1 (G1): 20 patients who received treatment involving the application of flurbiprofen gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planing. Specifically, on the test site of each patient, one milliliter of 2.5% flurbiprofen gel was applied, while on the contralateral side, placebo gel was administered as the control intervention. * Group 2 (G2): 20 patients who received treatment involving the application of aloe Vera gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planing. Specifically, on the test site of each patient, one milliliter of 98% aloe Vera was applied, while on the contralateral side, placebo gel was administered as the control intervention. * Group 3 (G3): The intervention involved applying flurbiprofen gel on one site, while the contralateral side received an application of 98% aloe vera. The clinical examiner will not be informed of the treatment groups' distribution. Patients will be informed on self-performed plaque control measures. In the 4th week, 8th week, 12th week, 6 months week clinical examination will be performed to measure the periodontal pocket depth, gingival index, plaque index, clinical attachment level (CAL),and bleeding on probing. Statistical analysis was done using SAS 9.4 Software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for all continuous variables (periodontal parameters: CAL, PD, BOP, GI, PI) at the baseline, fourth week, eighth week, and twelfth week and 6 months. Repeated linear mixed-effects models (PROC MIXED in SAS) were used to examine the changes in all periodontal parameters over the five-time points within each group and between groups. An unstructured covariance matrix was used, residual plots were visually reviewed to check model fit, and extreme outliers were eliminated using the restricted likelihood distance. A Tukey-Kramer 8 correction was applied to all pairwise comparisons. One-way ANOVA was used to examine group differences in PD reduction and CAL. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
Gel was made of 20% poloxamer and 10% ethanol as an Optimum formulation with sustained release up to 48 hours and a reasonable sol gel transition phase (adjunctive to SRP)
the Aloe vera gel employed possessed a concentration of 98% and was obtained from the reputable brand Avivir (Denmark). The remaining 2% comprised normal saline. The process of obtaining the 98% Aloe vera gel involved meticulous washing of mature Aloe Vera leaves under running water, followed by the removal of their outer skin. Subsequently, each leaf was divided into smaller pieces, from which the gel was allowed to seep out and carefully collected in a sterile container. The collected gel was then stored at 4°C until the time of its application in the study (adjunctive to SRP)
saline
Beirut Arab University
Beirut, Lebanon
clinical attachment level
used to assess the loss of periodontal tissue support in periodontitis. It is the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (fixed point on the tooth) to the depth of the pocket
Time frame: 6 months
Probing Depth
used to detect the depth of the periodontal pocket. It is the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket.
Time frame: 6 months
Bleeding on Probing
It is an indicator of periodontal tissue inflammatory response. The probe is carefully introduced to the bottom of the pocket and gently moved laterally along the pocket wall. Depending on the severity of inflammation, bleeding can vary from a tenuous red line along the gingival sulcus to profuse bleeding (immediately after probing or few seconds after).
Time frame: 6 months
Plaque index
used to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on tooth surfaces. It measures the amount of dental plaque visible on the vestibular and lingual surfaces of all teeth, except the third molars. The amount of plaque is determined with disclosing solution and a range of scores of 0-5 is assigned with 0 denoting no plaque and 5 denoting heavy plaque (covering 2/3 of the tooth crown)
Time frame: 6 months
Gingival index
used to assess the severity of gingival inflammation. Scores ranges from 0-3 with 0 being normal and 3 being severe inflammation characterized by edema, redness, swelling, and spontaneous bleeding. This measurement is based on the presence or absence of bleeding on gentle probing
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.