In the face of imminent loss, many adults with metastatic cancer report a range of mental health challenges, including cancer-related trauma symptoms, fear of cancer progression and dying/death, anxiety, depression, and hopelessness, as well as physical symptoms such as fatigue and pain. Cancer patients may report feeling upset or haunted by imagined scenarios in a way that causes them distress and lowers their quality of life. This study aims to look at the acceptability and feasability of a writing-based intervention for adults with late-stage or recurrent cancer, or actively treated blood cancer. The EASE study uses a writing-based approach to address an individual's worst-case scenario about cancer because previous studies have shown that similar approaches have shown promise in reducing fear in early-stage cancer survivors and among adults with PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder). The EASE study represents a novel adaptation of this foundational work on written exposure therapy (WET) to address worst-case scenarios among adults with late stage cancers. The EASE study will include 5 weekly one-on-one online video sessions with a trained therapist where participants will be coached through writing exercises based on a worst-case scenario related to their cancer experience.
This single-arm pilot trial aims to look at the acceptability and feasibility of a writing-based intervention for adults with metastatic or recurrent cancer, or actively treated blood cancer. The EASE intervention represents a novel adaptation of foundational work on written exposure therapy (WET) to address worst-case scenarios among adults with metastatic cancer, including cancer diagnosed at Stage III or IV, cancer that has recurred, or actively treated lymphoproliferative cancer. The study will consist of 5 weekly one-on-one online sessions with a trained graduate student therapist who will explain the approach and coach participants through writing exercises based on a worst-case scenario related to their fears about cancer. Remote Delivery. The intervention will be delivered remotely via videoconferencing software or videoconferencing plus phone. Phone sessions will be available as a backup if a participant has significant technical difficulties with Zoom. All sessions will be recorded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
An innovative written exposure therapy intervention that addresses psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with late stage cancers.
University of Colorado Boulder
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Cancer-related trauma symptoms
A primary outcome will be change in cancer-related trauma symptoms, assessed by the 22-item Impact of Events Scale-Revised. Possible scores range 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress/bother.
Time frame: Assessed seven times: prior to the intervention (Pre), before each intervention session, 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Fear of cancer progression
A primary outcome will be change in fear of cancer progression, assessed by the 12-item Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form and by the four general scale items from the Concerns about Recurrence Scale, with wording adapted to focus on cancer progression rather than recurrence. Range: 12-60, higher scores are associated with higher fear of cancer progression.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), before each intervention session, 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Intervention acceptability
Assessed with the Acceptability of Intervention Scale. Possible scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater intervention acceptability.
Time frame: Assessed in order to compare values at 2 timepoints: 6 weeks after baseline (Post) and separately at 1.5-month follow-up (FU)
Intervention Feasibility
For participants who begin the intervention, at least 70% complete all intervention sessions
Time frame: Assessed at each intervention session 1-5, 1 to 5 weeks after baseline.
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Patient-reported depression symptom questionnaire. Range is 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate more depression symptoms
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post),, at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire
Patient-reported anxiety symptom questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
The Death Attitude Profile-Revised, Fear of Death and Death Avoidance Scales
Patient-reported fear of death and dying questionnaire. Possible scores range from 12-84, with higher scores indicating greater fear of death and dying
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Hopelessness Assessment in Illness Questionnaire 8-item
Patient-reported hopelessness specifically intended for use with adults with incurable cancer. Possible scores range 0-16, with higher scores indicating greater hopelessness.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue-Short Form v1.0
Patient-reported levels of fatigue. Possible scores range 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference-Short Form v1.0
Patient-reported dimension of pain interference (e.g., the extent to which pain interferes with daily life and life roles). Possible scores range 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Emotional Approach Coping Scale (COPE): Avoidance coping (process measure)
Patient-reported coping through avoidance using three avoidance coping scales (mental disengagement, denial, physical disengagement) with cancer as the anchor. Possible scores range 8-28, with higher scores indicating greater denial, mental and behavioral disengagement.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, Nonjudge and nonreact scales (process measure)
Patient-reported coping through acceptance. Possible scores range 15-75, with higher scores reflecting greater nonreactivity and nonjudging of inner experience.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Valuing Questionnaire
Valued engagement in daily life. Possible scores range 0-30 for each of the two subscales with higher scores indicating greater engagement and sense of purpose in life.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
Self-compassion Scale-Short Form
Self-compassion questionnaire. Possible scores range 12-60 with higher scores indicating higher self-compassion.
Time frame: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.