This ClinicalTrials.gov posting contains two randomized controlled trials. The study procedures were identical, except Study 1 was funded by NIH and enrolled adults with chronic low back pain, whereas Study 2 was funded by the UW Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and enrolled adults with any type of chronic pain. Study 1 and 2 each enrolled 50 adults (N = 100 total across the two studies). Although Study 2 did not use NIH funds, we are including the results here because the studies were conducted simultaneously by the same PI (Dr. Jensen) with the same study procedures. Participants enrolled in the studies for a duration of 8 weeks. The studies test the feasibility and efficacy of a therapeutic hypnosis digital application (website), called Rose. The investigators wanted to determine if the Rose application was user-friendly and effective at improving quality of life and reducing pain for adults with chronic pain. If successfuly, the investigators hope to develop the Rose application into a mobile app that will be publicly available and managed by HypnoScientific Inc., a company that is co-owned by the investigators. Participants completed brief (15-20min) self-report surveys that ask about pain and mental health at three timepoints: Baseline (week 0), 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.
Pain is a major public health problem that affects over 100 million adults in the United States. While pain can have profound negative impacts, current treatment remains inadequate. A focus on opioid treatments has led to over-prescription, harmful side effects, and the overuse crisis. To address this problem, the study investigators, and others, have developed and adapted hypnosis to empower individuals to self-manage pain. Findings from the investigators' research supports hypnosis as an effective non-pharmacological technique. However, a significant limitation of hypnosis treatment is access, given that hypnosis treatment is provided by a very limited number of clinicians with training in its use, as well as the significant costs of in-person treatment. The main goal of this study is to pilot test the efficacy of hypnosis content for pain management as provided via recordings in the Rose web application.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
A web application (Rose) that contains hypnosis audio recordings created by the investigators.
University of Washington, School of Medicine
Seattle, Washington, United States
Frequency of Using Rose Application
Total # of hypnosis sessions listened to by participants
Time frame: During the 8 weeks of study participation
Continued Interest in Using Rose Application
Participants reporting how interested they would be in continuing to use the Rose application: "If the Rose web/phone application were available to download, how interested would you be in downloading and using this application?" 4 - Extremely interested 3 - Very interested 2 - Somewhat interested 1 - Little interested 0 - Not interested
Time frame: 8 week assessment
Willingness to Pay for Continued Use of Rose Application
Participants that reported a willingness to pay for continued access to the Rose application (results available for Study 2 only): "Would you be willing to pay some amount for a monthly subscription to Rose, to have continued access?" 1 - Yes 0 - No
Time frame: 8 week assessment
Participant Satisfaction
Participants answered a Global Satisfaction question about their satisfaction with using the Rose application "Taking all things into account, how satisfied are you with using the Rose web application?" 4 - Very Satisfied 3 - Somewhat Satisfied 2 - Neutral 1 - Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 - Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: 4 Week, 8 Week timepoints
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Scale title: System Usability Scale. Minimum - Maximum range: 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more usability (ease of use). There are no subscale scores for this measure.
Time frame: 8 Week Timepoint
Average Pain - Past Week
A 0-10 Numerical Rating scale of average pain in the past week: "Please rate your pain by choosing the one number that best describes your pain at its WORST in the PAST WEEK, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine"
Time frame: Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
Worst Pain - Past Week
A 0-10 Numerical Rating scale of worst pain in the past week: "Please rate your pain by choosing the one number that best describes your pain at its WORST in the PAST WEEK, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine"
Time frame: Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a
Domain assessed: Sleep Disturbance. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample). Higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance. Scores that are \>= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form
Domain assessed: Pain interference. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample). Higher scores indicate more pain interference. Scores that are \>= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 7a
Domain assessed: Anxiety. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample). Higher scores indicate more anxiety. Scores that are \>= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
Number of Participants Using Opioids
Domain assessed: Opioid Use How assessed: Single item asking participants to indicate whether or not they currently using any opioid mediations. Unit of measure is the number and rate of participants who indicated that they are currently using at least one opioid medication.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.