Some children who are born very early or have other congenital conditions may develop severe, long-term lung problems that make them need to use a breathing machine to live at home. There are no studies that identify the best ways to monitor a home breathing machine or adjust its settings. Increasingly, healthcare systems are using information collected at home to make more informed decisions about a patient's healthcare treatment, which is called "remote patient monitoring". This study will ask whether using remote patient monitoring can provide more complete information to a child's team of doctors, nurses, and respiratory therapists to help a child's healthcare team and family make more informed decisions about a child's home ventilator care. The investigators are hypothesizing it can safely decrease the level of breathing support children need while also avoiding emergency and hospital care and supporting their growth, development, and participation in daily life.
This is a single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial using remote patient monitoring for chronic management of invasive home mechanical ventilation in children. The investigators hypothesize that integration of longitudinal physiologic data and patient reported outcome measures into routine clinical care over 4 months can optimize home mechanical ventilation use by 1) reducing the level home mechanical ventilation level of support, 2) improving patient and family quality of life, specifically participation in daily activities and patient's lung symptoms, and 3) improving family-reported shared decision-making and child's access to ventilator care. The investigators will also evaluate its usability within family life and provider workflows and assess early implementation outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Patient-families will be given a "remote patient monitoring (RPM) bundle" with tools to measure objective and subjective information about the child at home that are shared with the home ventilator provider team through an electronic dashboard. The tools include a device to measure carbon dioxide, a digital tablet, a digital weight scale, and a digital application that connects to the child's electronic health record. Each child will be assigned an individualized remote monitoring schedule (timing and data type) based on their indication for ventilation and ventilator regimen at enrollment.
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Level of ventilator support
Liters/kg/day
Time frame: 4 months
Cessation of awake positive pressure
Percentage of patients on any positive pressure ventilation during the day (per post discharge days)
Time frame: 4 months
Cessation of positive pressure
Percentage of patients on any positive pressure ventilation at any time (per post discharge days)
Time frame: 4 months
Ventilator management frequency
Number of ventilator management changes made per patient
Time frame: 4 months
Quality of life via participation
Two questions asking about to what extent the child's health issues interfered the child and the parent's with ability to engage in their usual activities. The questions are scored as 1, Not at all, 2, Slightly, 3, Moderately, 4, Quite a lot , 5, Extremely regarding how much the child's health affecting activity participation.
Time frame: 4 months
Lung symptom control
Parent report using bronchopulmonary dysplasia survey measure
Time frame: 4 months
Level of shared decision making
National Survey of Children's Health shared decision-making survey questions
Time frame: 4 months
Perceived access to ventilator care
Parent reported survey measure of their child's access to ventilator care
Time frame: 4 months
Child growth
Patient height and weight (absolute and Z scores)
Time frame: 4 months
Child healthcare utilization
Number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Time frame: 4 months
Reach
To what degree potential patient participants participated, defined by comparing how many were approached versus participated.
Time frame: 4 months
Adoption
What percentage of eligible providers participated and what percentage of patients completed study.
Time frame: 4 months
Implementation
What was the rate of data collection and entry were completed by parents and reviewed by providers.
Time frame: 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.