This clinical trial tests how well a pain management intervention preparatory to a future pragmatic trial works in rural dwelling and Hispanic cancer survivors. Cancer pain is a key case study in health disparities in the United States. Cancer pain is prevalent, under treated, and remains a major cause of suffering, impairment, and disability for millions of Americans. Individual pain interventions and care models show promise for cancer pain in controlled settings. Hispanic and rural-dwelling cancer survivors stand to benefit the most from electronic health record innovations, as each of these health disparities populations experience profound disparities in pain outcomes, including marked under- and over-prescribing of opioids. Additionally, Hispanics not only comprise a steadily growing proportion of cancer survivors, but are also increasingly immigrating to rural communities, potentially placing them at "double risk" for poor outcomes. This trial will allow for the refinement of pain management intervention components that could help the management of cancer-related pain in rural dwelling and Hispanic cancer survivors.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To refine and pilot test components of a validated collaborative care model-based intervention aimed at improving pain control among rural dwelling and Hispanic cancer survivors. GROUP I: Participants meet with pain care manager (PCM) and community health worker (CHW) via telephone or video visit to discuss the cancer-related pain. Participants receive self-guided pain management education materials and receive an action plan with suggestions or referrals to participate in tier 1 interventions that include exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, medication and/or tier 2 interventions that include integrative medicine (massage, acupuncture and mindfulness relaxation), spiritual support, pain clinic referral and palliative and spiritual care referrals during the intake visit. Participants undergo a planning visit 2 weeks later to give an update on their pain and may receive additional resources from the PCM and/or CHW. Participants then undergo a final visit 4 weeks later with the PCM and/or CHW and receive final recommendations and referrals. Participants may receive a follow up call between intake and visit 2 and/or between visit 2 and the final visit from the CHW or PCM to assess pain levels on study. GROUP II: ASCENT study interventionists complete an interview on study. GROUP III: Medical oncology providers participate in a focus group on study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
51
Undergo acupuncture therapy
Receive pain clinic referral
Undergo CBT
Participate in focus group
Receive self-guided pain management education materials
Participate in exercise
Complete interview
Receive massage
Practice mindfulness
Receive pain treatment/medicine
Receive palliative care referral
Undergo visits with PCM and CHW for pain management
Receive pain management referrals
Receive spiritual support
Receive spiritual care referral
Ancillary studies
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Feasibility of Intervention
Assessed by proportion of participants who received key intervention components.
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Acceptability of Intervention - Interaction
As assessed by frequency of participant interaction with care team.
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Acceptability of Intervention - Satisfaction
As assessed by participant satisfaction with care team interactions
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Utility of Intervention - Helpfulness
Assessed by study-specific questionnaire. Questions were answered on an Adjectival Ordinal 5-point scale where 1 = not at all and 5 = extremely helpful.
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Utility of Intervention - Confidence
Assessed by study-specific questionnaire. Questions were answered on an Adjectival Ordinal 5-point scale where 1 = not at all confident and 5 = extremely confident.
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Utility of Intervention - Ease
Assessed by study-specific questionnaire. Questions were answered on an Adjectival Ordinal 5-point scale where 1 = very difficult and 5 = extremely easy.
Time frame: Up to 60 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.