The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab compared to placebo plus cetuximab in participants with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HPV-negative Head and Neck Cancer. The primary hypothesis is that ficlatuzumab combined with cetuximab is superior to cetuximab alone in terms of progression-free survival and/or overall survival.
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of ficlatuzumab combined with cetuximab (Arm 1 or Arm 2) to a control arm of placebo plus cetuximab (Arm 3) in participants with R/M human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative HNSCC. Eligible participants must have failed prior therapy with an anti-PD-1 \[programmed cell death protein 1\] or PD-L1 \[programmed death ligand 1\] immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and with platinum-based chemotherapy, administered in combination or sequentially. Failure of prior treatment may be due to progression of disease or intolerance to treatment. It is anticipated that the study will enroll approximately 410 participants across 3 arms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
410
Ficlatuzumab (AV-299) is a humanized hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) inhibitory immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody (mAb).
Cetuximab is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist.
Placebo for this study will be normal saline
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGThe University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of California Los Angeles
Westwood, Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGYale School of Medicine - Smilow Cancer Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
To compare the efficacy by overall survival of ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death for any cause
Time frame: From Randomization until death from any cause (Approximately 44 months)
To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) for ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame: From Randomization until disease progression or death (Approximately 44 months)
To evaluate additional objective response rate for ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Objective response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of participants who have a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 until last response assessment (response assessments are every 8 weeks for the first year, every 12 weeks for years 2 and 3 and then every 6 months)
To evaluate disease control rate (DCR) for ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Disease control rate (DCR), defined for participants who have achieved a CR, PR or stable disease for at least 8 weeks per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 until last response assessment (response assessments are every 8 weeks for the first year, every 12 weeks for years 2 and 3 and then every 6 months)
To evaluate duration of response (DOR) for ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Duration of response (DOR), defined as the time from first documented evidence of a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 until last response assessment (response assessments are every 8 weeks for the first year, every 12 weeks for years 2 and 3 and then every 6 months)
To compare the safety and tolerability of ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Number of times participants experience Adverse Events (AE) or abnormal laboratory values.
Time frame: From Screening until 30 days after last dose
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ficlatuzumab
Serum samples will be assessed for concentrations of ficlatuzumab
Time frame: From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose) until End of Treatment (Approximately 44 months)
To assess the immunogenicity of ficlatuzumab via antidrug antibodies (ADAs)
Serum samples will be assessed for the presence of ADA to ficlatuzumab.
Time frame: From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose) until End of Treatment (Approximately 44 months)
To assess the immunogenicity of ficlatuzumab via neutralizing antibodies (nAB)
Serum samples that test positive for the presence of ADA to ficlatuzumab will be further tested for the presence of nAB.
Time frame: From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose) until End of Treatment (Approximately 44 months)
To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of ficlatuzumab plus cetuximab vs placebo plus cetuximab in participants with R/M HNSCC
Change from baseline in overall health status and time to clinically meaningful deterioration based on scoring of standardized participant questionnaires
Time frame: From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose) until End of Treatment (Approximately 44 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The George Washington University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
RECRUITINGAdventHealth Medical Group Oncology & Hematology at Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGEmory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, United States
RECRUITINGMary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
RECRUITING...and 100 more locations