Open label study to determine tolerability and efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in heart and lung transplant recipients. The study hypotheses are: 1. Letermovir prophylaxis will be associated with similar rates of CMV infection as valganciclovir among heart and lung transplant recipients 2. Letermovir will be better tolerated than valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in heart and lung transplant recipients, with a higher proportion of days of completed therapy with correct dosing during the planned prophylaxis period 3. Letermovir will have a lower rate of neutropenia than valganciclovir when used for CMV prophylaxis in heart and lung transplant recipients 4. Incorrect renal dosing will occur less frequently with letermovir than with valganciclovir when used for CMV prophylaxis in heart and lung transplant recipients
This study is a prospective cohort design. Subjects exposed to letermovir for CMV prophylaxis following heart or lung transplantation will be compared with those who received standard valganciclovir prophylaxis in the two years before the study began (referred to as the "pre-intervention" period). The goal is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of letermovir.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in thoracic organ transplant recipients. Letermovir will be administered by oral administration, as per study protocol. The intended duration of therapy will be up to 365 days, depending on organ transplanted and donor and recipient CMV status. However, treatment may discontinued as discussed in Section 7. Letermovir is dosed at 480mg daily for patients with CrCl \>10. Dose adjustment, as per package insert, is recommended in setting of co-administration of cyclosporine, with dose reduction of letermovir to 240mg daily. Missed doses of letermovir will not be made up.
Penn Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGCMV viral load
The primary outcome will be CMV infection (CMV viremia with CMV viral load \>1,000, CMV syndrome, or tissue invasive CMV disease) during the planned prophylaxis period and the following 180 days
Time frame: Prophylaxis period plus 180 days
Proportion of days during which appropriately renally-dosed prophylaxis
The primary outcome will be the proportion of days during which appropriately-dosed prophylaxis was received during the planned treatment course.
Time frame: 90 to 365 days post intervention
Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection
The proportion of subjects who develop biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection
Time frame: Prophylaxis period plus 180 days
Proportion of subjects who develop CMV resistance
CMV resistance will be determined by the presence of a clinically significant mutation on genomic sequencing
Time frame: Prophylaxis period plus 180 days
Proportion of subjects who develop neutropenia
Proportion of subjects who develop Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 1,500/microliter)
Time frame: 90 to 365 days of prophylaxis period
Proportion of subjects who develop severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50,000/microliter)
Proportion of subjects who develop severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50,000/microliter)
Time frame: 90 to 365 days of prophylaxis period
Proportion of subjects with Unplanned discontinuation of MMF or azathioprine
Proportion of subjects with Unplanned discontinuation of MMF or azathioprine
Time frame: 90 to 365 days of prophylaxis period
Number subjects with Incorrect renal dosing at any point during the planned prophylaxis period (measured as a binary variable, where the outcome is met if the recipient receives any days of incorrect dosing per their GFR).
Number subjects with Incorrect renal dosing at any point during the planned prophylaxis period (measured as a binary variable, where the outcome is met if the recipient receives any days of incorrect dosing per their GFR).
Time frame: 90 to 365 days of prophylaxis period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.