A cost-utility analysis based on an earlier published RCT comparing surgery with volar locking plate to non-operative treatment for the elderly with a displaced distal radius fracture.
Study design: A cost-utility analysis of a patient population included in a previous published randomized controlled trial. Patient population:140 patients 70 years of age or older with a displaced distal radius fracture that met the inclusion and no exclusion criteria at Danderyd Hospital or Södersjukhuset Hospital were randomized to volar locking plate or non-operative treatment with a cast. Primary outcome: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 1 and 3 years. Data collection: Prospectively collected clinical data is available for 4, 12, weeks, 1 and 3 years. Costs will be analysed regarding surgical equipment, inpatient stay, surgical time. Prescriptions of analgesics and antibiotics as well as inpatient and outpatient consumption over a three years period after the injury will be retrieved from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.The life expectancy adjusted life years (QALYs) is calculated from prospectively collected results from EQ-5D.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
140
Surgery
Non-operative treatment with a plaster cast
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division ot Ortopeadics
Stockholm, Sweden
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) at 1 year.
difference in cost divided by difference in quality of life
Time frame: 1 year
Absolute cost difference
difference in cost between treatments
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
ICER at 3 years
difference in cost divided by difference in quality of life
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.