Upper extremity (UE) recovery remains a huge rehabilitation challenge with largely incomplete recovery of the upper limb post stroke. This is due to heavier priorities placed on other stroke competencies such as mobility, activities of daily living training and home integration which results in suboptimal amounts of time spent in upper limb training post stroke. In this study the investigators plan to pilot brain computer interface (BCI) integrated wearable hand robotic glove (HandyRehab) system for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.
Robot-aided therapy have shown promising results in rehabilitation recovery in stroke patients while reducing strain and effort for both the therapist and suitable patients. HandyRehab (HR) is a portable, wearable hand robotic glove used for functional training. The integration of Brain Computer Interface (BCI) platform with HR provides an alternative way of communication or intended movement through end-effectors for stroke and potentially facilitate neuroplasticity, improving motor functions. This study aims to validate the usability of intensive training with HandyRehab (HR) compared with conventional occupational therapy (CT). Feasibility and safety of the novel BCI-HR will be examined and objective measures of clinical efficacy will be compared across all 3 platforms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
To test the usability, safety and efficacy of an experimental prototype of a wearable hand robotic glove integrated with brain computer interface system being developed and researched.
A wearable hand robotic glove approved by Health Sciences Authority, class I commercial device
Standard Conventional Occupational Therapy
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
RECRUITINGAction Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Functional and dexterity score in the affected arm evaluated using 19 tests of motor function across 4 subsets; minimum score = 0, maximum score = 57, with higher score indicating better function.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) scale
Change in Fugl Meyer Motor Assessment score in the affected arm, minimum: 0, maximum: 66 with higher scores indicating greater levels of mobility function
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Grip Strength (kg)
Measured by Digital hand-held Dynamometer (mean of 3 readings) for both hands
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Box and Block Test (BBT)
Measures unilateral gross manual dexterity.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
Measures finger dexterity in stroke patients.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Self-efficacy outcomes by UPSET (upper limb self-efficacy test)
Questionnaire to measure self-efficacy in various tasks after stroke.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Hr-QOL scales using SS-QOL (Stroke specific Quality of Life scale)
Quality of life scale specific to stroke patients, minimum 49, maximum 245; with higher scores indicating better function.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Patient reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using subjective scales (Likert 0-5)
Measures patient's opinion on the usability of HR and BCI-HR
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 12, 24, 52 (follow-up)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Screening assessment to determine cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 24, 52 (follow-up)
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Cognitive assessment to evaluate verbal learning and memory
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 24, 52 (follow-up)
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Neuropsychological test assessing visual attention and task switching.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 24, 52 (follow-up)
Digit Span
Cognitive Assessment of both forward and backward variants.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 24, 52 (follow-up)
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Neuropsychological measure of verbal fluency.
Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (end training), 24, 52 (follow-up)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.