The LockeT II study is a single center, prospective randomized study. It is intended to study the effectiveness of using LockeT device to gain hemostasis after venous procedures as compared to Manual Compression (MC). Approximately 110 patients will be enrolled.
The volume of catheter ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias are on the rise in the United States and worldwide. Despite decrease in complication rates due to refinement in ablation tools and techniques, achieving vascular hemostasis following large-bore sheath femoral access remains a challenge. Thus, MC remains the current standard of care. However, MC requires up to 8 hours of prolonged bedrest, which is associated with longer length of stay and complications from indwelling catheters. Another method of vascular closure is the figure-of-eight (FoE) stitch - a subcutaneous suture that has been evaluated to achieve homeostasis following major cardiovascular procedures. In recent years, invasive, vascular closure devices have become popular. However, results continue to suggest that the risk versus benefit has not been definitively demonstrated. Instead, the LockeT is a new suture retention device designed to closely mimic manual compression by distributing the tension of a FoE stitch over a larger surface area. In such a way, patients can have the benefits of MC without a healthcare professional to stand bedside.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
For subjects that are assigned to the LockeT device arm, the healthcare professional will place the LockeT with suture above the wound to achieve compression instead of manually holding pressure on the sutures. After hemostasis is achieved and prior to ambulation the LockeT will be removed followed by suture removal.
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute - Roe Clinic
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
RECRUITINGOverland Park Regional Medical Center
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
RECRUITINGCenterpoint Medical Center Clinic
Independence, Missouri, United States
Effectiveness of using the LockeT suture retention device
Effectiveness of using the LockeT suture retention device to gain hemostasis after venous procedures as compared to standard Manual Compression (MC) will be assessed.
Time frame: 2 Days
Patient, physician, and nursing staff benefits
Patient, physician, and nursing staff benefits of the LockeT device will be assessed via LockeT device questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5, 1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree.
Time frame: 2 Days
Patient discomfort with Locket device
Pain discomfort will be assessed via Locket device questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5, 1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree.
Time frame: 2 Days
Incidence of hematoma/ecchymosis
The incidence of hematoma/ecchymosis post-procedure will be assessed.
Time frame: 2 Days
Safety of LockeT device
Safety of LockeT device will be assessed by the incidence of adverse events, including but not limited to: vascular complications, like atrioventricular (AV) fistula, retroperitoneal bleed, surgical exploration of the groin (thrombin injection, open surgery or ligation); need for blood transfusion, defined as a 2 gm post-procedure drop in hemoglobin, or symptoms of anemia,).
Time frame: 2 Days
Comparison of Manual Compression labor cost and Locket device cost
Manual Compression labor cost and Locket device cost will be compared
Time frame: 2 Days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centerpoint Medical Center
Independence, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Medical Center Clinic
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
RECRUITING