Ambulatory surgery is increasingly used in anesthesia. In case of general anesthesia, it is recommended to use anesthesia molecules with a short half-life and low doses of opiates to ensure a rapid awakening and to prevent nausea and vomiting by systematic administration of anti-emetics during the operation. Opiates (including sufentanil) have recently been called into question because of the nausea and vomiting and the delay in waking up induced by these molecules. To combat these side effects, the authors have proposed either to reduce the doses or to substitute them with dexmedetomidine, a sedative antihypertensive drug. Recent studies have demonstrated that opiates used in general anesthesia can be replaced by dexmedetomidine. However, literature data are controversial concerning the hemodynamic impact. No study has compared the hemodynamic profile of opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus conventional anesthesia with opioids. The ambulatory context lends itself to the use of dexmedetomidine because it is aimed at a population without strong cardiac pathology, concerns non-major interventions, with the need to optimize pain and side effects. The study authors therefore wish to compare the effects of induction of general anesthesia with low-dose Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil, on post-induction hemodynamic stability in scheduled outpatient surgeries. The investigators hypothesize that hemodynamic stability at induction of general anesthesia with low-dose dexmedetomidine is not inferior to that obtained with sufentanil in scheduled ambulatory surgeries.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
594
Induction of general anesthesia by administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/Kg (maximum dose 50 µg) in titration by bolus of 10µg intravenously over 5 minutes
Induction of general anesthesia by administration of sufentanil 0.25µg/Kg (maximum dose 20 µg) intravenously at anesthetic induction.
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
RECRUITINGIntraoperative hemodynamic stability during anesthesia between groups
Incidence of mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg
Time frame: Within 60 minutes after induction
Intraoperative hemodynamic stability according to baseline mean arterial pressure between groups
Percentage of patients with 30% change in mean arterial pressure from baseline
Time frame: Within 60 minutes after induction
Intraoperative heart rate between groups
Percentage of patients with bradycardia ≤45bpm/min
Time frame: Within 60 minutes after induction
Intraoperative hypertensive episodes between groups
Percentage of patients with at least one episode of arterial hypertension (mean arterial pressure \> 100mmHg)
Time frame: Within 60 minutes after induction
Hemodynamic stability in the ICU between groups
Percentage of patients with at least one episode of a Systolic Blood Pressure below 90mmHg (SBP \< 90mmHg) in the ICU
Time frame: Day 0 at discharge from ICU
Intraoperative vasopressor use between groups
Amount of IV Ephedrine (in mg) administered intraoperatively to maintain mean arterial pressure \> 60 mmHg
Time frame: Day 0, during surgery
Intraoperative IV Atropine use between groups
Amount of IV Atropine (in µg) administered intraoperatively to maintain a heart rage \> 45bpm
Time frame: Day 0, during surgery
Failure of ambulatory management between groups between groups
Percentage of patients hospitalized after surgery
Time frame: Day 1
Patient reported pain between groups
Pain reported on a 0-10 visual analog scale
Time frame: Day 0
Patient reported pain between groups
Pain reported on a 0-10 visual analog scale
Time frame: Day 1
Patient reported pain between groups
Pain reported on a 0-10 visual analog scale
Time frame: Day 2
Patient reported pain between groups
Pain reported on a 0-10 visual analog scale
Time frame: Day 7
Immediate nausea and vomiting between groups
Percentage of patients with nausea and vomiting according to use of Ondansetron IV
Time frame: Day 0 during ICU stay
Post-operative nausea and vomiting between groups
Percentage of patients reporting absence/presence nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Day 0 at discharge from surgery
Post-operative nausea and vomiting between groups
Percentage of patients reporting absence/presence nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Day 1
Post-operative nausea and vomiting between groups
Percentage of patients reporting absence/presence nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Day 2
Post-operative nausea and vomiting between groups
Percentage of patients reporting absence/presence nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Day 7
Patient postoperative recovery between groups
Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-40) (score 0-200)
Time frame: Day 2
Patient satisfaction with perioperative management between groups
Evaluation of Experience of General Anesthesia questionnaire (EVAN-G) (score 5-100)
Time frame: Day 2
Occurrence of adverse events after surgery between groups
Absence/presence of the following adverse events: bleeding, hematoma or re-hospitalization
Time frame: Day 2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.