. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via omitting the intraabdominal drains compared to regular using of the drains in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.
Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. In Group A : the investigators will put intraabdominal drains, and in Group ,thd investigators will not put any intraabdominal drains. Our primary outcomes will be hospital stayl engthand pain score;Data analysis packages will be SPSS version 21 Qualitative data will be presented by number and percentage, quantitative data by mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
omitting the intraabdominal drains
The investigators will put intraabdominal drains
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
number of days of hospital stay
hospital stay length
Time frame: Up to 30 days
number of patients with infection-related postoperative complications such as superficial, deep or organ space SSI, hospital acquired pneumonia
number of patients with infection-related postoperative complications such as superficial, deep or organ space SSI, hospital acquired pneumonia
Time frame: 30 days
incidence of Post operative repair leak
incidence of Post operative repair leak
Time frame: 30 days
number of days before frist bowel motion
number of days before frist bowel motion
Time frame: 7 days
severity of operative pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS
from 1 to 10 1 indicated minimum pain and 10 maximum pain
Time frame: 7 days
INCIDENCE OF postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONAV
INCIDENCE OF postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONAV
Time frame: 7 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.